Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administrative Rules topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee accepts residential care rules and adopts genetic counselor rules while rejecting a referenced ethics section

2767425 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In a short rules session before the HB138 hearing, the House Health and Welfare Committee accepted rule dockets for the Board of Examiners of Residential Care Facility Administrators and for the Genetic Counselors board; committee also voted to reject an incorporated reference to the National Society of Genetic Counselors code of ethics.

BOISE — Before the House Health and Welfare Committee took up House Bill 138, members voted on several rule dockets.

Residential care facility administrators: The committee accepted docket 241901-2401 (rules of the Idaho Board of Examiners of Residential Care Facility Administrators). Katie Stewart, bureau chief at the Division of Occupational and Professional Licenses, told the committee the division would combine the board with the nursing home administrators board and pursue fee-cap changes in statute to address a negative cash balance; she described a proposed biannual licensure cap increase from $400 to $600 as a way to give the board flexibility to recover its cash balance. Representative McCann moved to accept docket 241901-2401 and the motion carried by voice vote.

Genetic counselors: The committee approved the rules in docket 2424000-2401 but voted to reject section 2, item 3 of the incorporated-by-reference National Society of Genetic Counselors Code of Ethics located in IDAPA 24.24.01 section 2. Representative Levitt moved to reject that specific incorporated reference; the committee adopted the motion by voice vote.

Why it matters: The votes finalize the committees’ review of administrative rule packages and resolve a dispute about whether an external professional code of ethics should be incorporated by reference into state administrative rule. Committee members said rejecting the referenced ethics section avoids conflict with Idaho’s code of ethics.

Ending: The rules minutes and the committee’s actions will be reflected in the administrative code and legislative record.