Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

JFAC approves program-maintenance budgets across state government; summary of motions and roll-call results

2407165 · January 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee on Jan. 17 set FY2026 program maintenance budgets and accompanying clear language or reappropriation authority for multiple state agencies. Most motions passed unanimously; the Department of Health and Welfare items drew limited dissent.

Boise — The Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee spent the Jan. 17 hearing advancing program-maintenance appropriations and standard budget language for a broad set of state agencies. Committee actions set FY2026 base budgets, added statewide cost-allocation and contract-inflation adjustments where requested, and approved follow-up language such as reappropriation authority and program transfer exemptions. Most measures passed on unanimous roll-call votes.

Votes at a glance (motions approved by JFAC on Jan. 17):

- Legislative Branch (Legislative Services Office and Office of Performance Evaluations): Program maintenance $12,546,100; no FTP cap; motion passed 20–0.

- Judicial Branch (Court Operations, Guardian ad Litem, Judicial Council): Program maintenance $96,696,300; no FTP cap; motion passed 20–0.

- Constitutional Officers (six statewide elected officials other than Superintendent of Public Instruction): Program maintenance $73,630,300; FTP cap 431.91; motion passed 20–0.

- Public Safety (Corrections, Juvenile Corrections, Idaho State Police, Brand Inspection, Racing Commission): Program maintenance $528,074,000; FTP cap 3,322.61; motion passed 20–0.

- General Government (Department of Administration and related agencies, Governor’s office, State Tax Commission): Program maintenance $479,688,000; motion passed 20–0 and FTP caps set as shown in the committee packet.

- Economic Development functional area (including Department of Commerce, Agriculture, Labor, Insurance, State Historical Society, veterans services and many others): Program maintenance $1,380,135,600; FTP cap 4,165.28; motion passed 20–0.

- Natural Resources (DEQ, Fish & Game, Lands, Endowment Fund Investment Board, Parks & Recreation, Water Resources): Program maintenance $513,855,000; FTP cap 1,632.4; motion passed 20–0.

- State Board of Education and related higher-education programs (including universities, community colleges, agricultural research & extension): Program maintenance $1,099,940,000; FTP cap 534.97 for certain programs, with other institutions exempt from FTP caps as noted in the packet; motion passed 20–0.

- Public School Support: Program maintenance totals set at $3,166,965,700 (general, dedicated and federal combined as recorded); no FTP caps (school personnel not state FTEs under this appropriation); motion passed 20–0.

- Health & Human Services (Department of Health and Welfare and State Independent Living Council): Program maintenance totals later approved at $5,263,083,200 combined (see separate article for reorganization dissent); motion passed with a recorded vote (final tally 17 ayes, 2 nays, 1 absent/excused for the main program-maintenance appropriation).

Committee staff also presented and the committee approved standard sections of budget language that commonly accompany maintenance bills: exemptions from expense-class or program transfer limitations (where historically allowed), reappropriation authority for ARPA and other one-time funds, continuous appropriation authority where applicable, reporting requirements and accountability provisions, and small, program-specific transfers (for example, capital project carryovers or fund transfers specified in the packet).

Most votes were unanimous; the committee used roll-call voting for each action and recorded outcomes in the hearing transcript. Committee staff said the bills adopted by motion will be drafted and returned to the committee for a review hearing once bill text is available, giving members one more opportunity to check technical drafting before bills proceed to the floor.