Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Judicial Request topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners signal support to seek funding for one additional judge; legislative request planned
Summary
After discussion of court workload and options (judges vs. commissioners), the board indicated preliminary support for asking the Legislature to authorize one new judicial officer rather than multiple at this time.
Get email alerts on the Judicial Request topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Spokane County commissioners discussed a legislative request for additional judicial capacity and signaled preliminary support for seeking authorization and funding for one additional judicial officer rather than asking immediately for multiple positions.
Why it matters: Adding judicial capacity requires legislative authorization and county budgeting for associated staff and operations. The board considered tradeoffs among judges, court commissioners and timing for any request to the Legislature.
During the meeting commissioners revisited prior analysis and requests: the local bar had requested three additional judicial positions, and commissioners explored whether one would be an appropriate near‑term request. Commissioners discussed the operational differences and costs between judges and court commissioners, noting that commissioners pay for court commissioners differently and that court commissioners have more limited authority (for example, they generally cannot preside over jury trials without agreed‑upon authority). One commissioner suggested asking for one judge now and pursuing additional requests later as funding permits. Staff noted that any request to the Legislature is a policy decision and would require planning; commissioners said they expect to pursue the legislative authorization process but emphasized budgeting constraints and the time frame for implementation.
The board did not adopt a formal resolution at this meeting; commissioners indicated staff should proceed with the legislative outreach process for the single‑judge request and return with budgeting and timing details.

