Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
SJC hears argument over whether Commonwealth may appeal habeas grants in SDP cases
Summary
At oral argument in SJC No. 13748 (Edward Pierce), lawyers and justices debated whether the court should overrule the long-standing Wyeth rule that bars government appeals of allowed habeas petitions, and whether habeas was the appropriate remedy when a sexually dangerous-person commitment may have lacked required qualified examiners.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard argument Tuesday in SJC No. 13748, Edward Pierce v. Commonwealth, over whether the Commonwealth may appeal orders granting habeas corpus relief in sexually dangerous-person (SDP) cases and whether the court should overrule the so-called Wyeth rule that generally bars government appeals from such habeas allowances.
Counsel for the respondent, Mary Murray, said appellate review is necessary to protect public safety and prevent the manipulative use of habeas petitions to evade appellate review. "All are best served by appellate review of orders discharging SDP...regardless of whatever title is given to the procedural mechanism below," Murray told the court. She argued Wyeth should be overruled because it "encourages the manipulative use of the petition for writ of habeas corpus to thwart the Commonwealth's right to challenge the legal correctness of orders."
The petitioner's counsel, Joseph Keneally, countered that habeas was appropriate in this case because, counsel argued,…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

