Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Childrens Mental Health topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Testimony raises concerns as Senate committee removes provider-facing wording in children's mental health rules

3220244 ยท January 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A member of the public told the Senate Health & Welfare Committee that new children's mental health rule language about 'medical necessity' could create confusion with court-ordered treatments; the department said the language reflects existing Medicaid practice and clinical determinations.

The Senate Health & Welfare Committee heard public testimony raising concerns that proposed language about "medical necessity" in new children's mental health rules could create confusion and barriers for children already engaged with juvenile court or other child-serving systems.

Britney Shipley testified she was speaking as a private citizen and described situations in which families seeking services through court orders might face additional delays if medical necessity determinations are not made by clinicians familiar with Idaho's children's mental health system. "Allowing medically necessary determinations to override judicial orders may undermine the authority of the courts and create further uncertainty for families already in crisis," Shipley said. She urged clearer definitions of who determines medical necessity and safeguards to avoid unintentionally delaying access to care.

Deputy Director Juliette Sharon and Legislative and Regulatory Affairs Chief Jared Larson responded that the proposed addition of medical necessity language is intended to reflect current practice under Medicaid and the department's contracts. "It is already in process. So with Medicaid funds and state funds for non Medicaid covered services ... we have to meet medical necessity, meaning that we can only pay for services that are deemed to be medically necessary, by a clinician," Sharon told the committee. She said determinations are made by clinicians with relevant pediatric behavioral-health expertise and that conversations between clinicians and courts can be part of resolving how to serve a child at an appropriate level of care.

Committee members asked for clarity on how medical necessity will interact with court orders and whether clinicians making the determinations will have the children's behavioral health expertise Shipley recommended. The department said dispute-resolution channels exist via the state's contractor (Magellan) and the department's behavioral-health oversight and invited further direct follow-up with testifiers.

The committee approved the docket to remove the department-as-provider language (reflecting that services are now provided under contract) by voice vote after Senator Ziderfeld moved the motion and Senator Harris seconded.