Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Safety Emergency Plans topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee introduces RS32018 to clarify background checks and shield school emergency plans from automatic public disclosure

2381715 · January 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Rep. Chris Mathias introduced RS32018 to clarify background-check language, require schools to maintain emergency operation plans and to exempt those plans and certain training materials from automatic public-record disclosure. The committee voted to introduce the RS for a full hearing.

Rep. Chris Mathias, D-District 19, told the Idaho House Committee on Education on Jan. 23 that RS32018 consolidates and clarifies school safety provisions in state code, strengthens background-check language and seeks to exempt school emergency operation plans and some training materials from automatic public disclosure.

“State law currently requires schools to report every single incident of bullying to the state and it sits in a spreadsheet, collects dust and doesn't really do much,” Mathias said, describing the RS as largely housekeeping that makes existing obligations clearer and more actionable. He said the proposed changes split a single “sloppy paragraph” into three clearer subsections about background checks, operation plans and teacher training.

Mathias said subsection 16B would protect emergency operation plans and certain training details from routine public-record disclosure at the request of school safety personnel: “It would be helpful if we weren't forced to release what our emergency plans are,” he said, adding safety practitioners supported that change.

Committee members asked about cost and scope. Rep. Harris asked whether expanding background-check coverage from “irregular contact” to “unsupervised contact” would increase costs; Mathias said stakeholders prioritized alignment with chapter 83, title 18 and did not provide a precise dollar estimate but felt the change was necessary regardless of marginal costs.

Rep. Nelson moved to introduce RS32018 for printing, citing the provision that would protect active-shooter response plans from becoming public. Representative Clow noted a typographical error in the statement of purpose that sponsors agreed to fix before the public hearing.

The committee voted to introduce RS32018; the motion carried by voice vote and the RS will proceed to a full bill hearing. Committee members requested follow-up data on potential costs and which officials would have access to protected materials for the hearing.