Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: planning board actions Sept. 24 — site plan approvals, waivers, minutes and schedule
Summary
Summary of formal actions taken by the Brentwood Planning Board on Sept. 24, including conditional site‑plan approval for 180 Route 25 (with conditions), mapping waiver approvals, a continuance for 1 Smith Road, approval of meeting minutes and a small budget line edit.
At its Sept. 24 meeting the Brentwood Planning Board recorded the following formal actions and votes:
- 180 Route 25 (Mastriano Group): Motion approved to grant a waiver tied to a 15,000‑gallon cistern per the Brentwood Fire Department letter and to grant conditional site‑plan approval for a six contractor‑bay building. Conditions include: final written sign‑off from Brentwood Fire Department confirming cistern location and access; engineered lighting plan (dark‑sky compliant) delivered in hard copy; New Hampshire DOT driveway/curb permit; NH DES septic approval; a stormwater operations and maintenance plan appended to the drainage calculations; and sign‑off letters from town planning/engineering staff and TEC. Outcome: approved (unanimous vote).
- Mapping/soils waiver: Board approved a mapping-related waiver (high intensity soils mapping waiver) after motion. Outcome: approved.
- 1 Smith Road site‑plan: Applicant requested additional time to have Beals Associates prepare drainage calculations and other engineering deliverables. The board voted to continue the hearing to Oct. 16 at 7 PM. Outcome: continued.
- Minutes (Sept. 24 work session): Motion to approve minutes carried. Outcome: approved.
- Budget line adjustment (planning budget): Board voted to authorize staff to reduce the printing and books line to $250 and to finalize small adjustments to reconcile overtime and related payroll items; staff to provide finalized budget to the select board. Outcome: approved (motion carried; one member recorded as opposed/abstaining on related budget procedural item).
Votes were recorded by voice; where roll‑call numbers were not specified in the transcript, the board announced “Aye” and no recorded negative votes were registered for the listed motions.
