Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning Access Easement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbor opposes rezoning near Alligator Lakeshore West; county staff says change is largely a name update
Summary
A resident objected to a request to rezone a 75-foot lot from RS1 to 'urban settlement' (county zoning nomenclature). The board approved consent public hearing items including item 26; county staff said the change is largely a renaming and noted variance and building-permit paths are available.
A resident told the Osceola Board of County Commissioners she strongly opposes a rezoning that would relabel a vacant lakeside parcel and potentially affect access to her property; county staff told the board the change is largely a zoning-name update and homeowners can seek a variance or pursue a building permit.
Angelique Lafever told the board she was “very opposed to this zoning change,” saying the vacant lot adjacent to her home was platted at about 74.9 feet and that RS1 zoning historically required 100 feet of lot width. Lafever said she has used part of the vacant lot for more than 25 years to access septic systems, perform maintenance and launch small boats, and that an easement allowing access has existed informally for decades. She asked the board to deny rezoning to urban settlement or postpone the decision until her attorneys are able to respond. “There is no other access and I have and always will need this access to access my property,” Lafever said during the quasi-judicial hearing.
County development administrator Ray Stangel told the board the lot was platted at 75 feet and that RS1’s minimum lot width is 100 feet, adding that the property owner could seek a variance from the Board of Adjustment. Stangel said other lots along that row are also 75 feet and that the building-permit application for the property has been submitted; he described access and easement concerns as private-property matters the county could help address through the permit process and staff engagement with the neighbor and her attorney.
Commissioner Booth, addressing the speaker’s access concerns, said the proposed zoning label change is “really nothing more than a name change” and does not, in his view, expand what can be built on the lot for this case; he acknowledged residents’ worries about septic and backyard impacts and asked staff and the county attorney to follow up with Lafever. During the exchange staff noted the county’s future land-use classification of Low Density Residential (LDR) allows roughly 3 to 8 units per acre and that an LDR side-yard setback would be 5 feet.
After discussion the board approved the consent public hearing items 22–30 (items 27–29 had been continued earlier in the meeting). The approval was made by motion of Commissioner Showery and seconded by Commissioner Booth and carried with no recorded opposition.
Lafever cited Florida statutory law in her remarks (she referred to “Florida statute 704.01” regarding an implied grant of way by necessity) and said she has retained counsel. Ray Stangel recommended staff work with the parties through the building-permit process and, if necessary, provide additional information about variance options.
The board recorded the approval of consent public hearing items 22–30; item 26 will proceed with the normal administrative and permit review processes, and staff indicated they will follow up with the resident and her attorney to address access and easement concerns.
