Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grant Allocation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews committee recommendations to allocate $436,000 in local grant funds; committee proposes caps, matches and municipal planning funds
Summary
Commissioners discussed a committee's unanimous recommendations for distribution of roughly $436,000 in accrued grant funds, the scoring process used, proposed $50,000 grant caps with matching requirements, and a plan to open a new application window.
Millard County commissioners reviewed recommendations from a grant review committee on how to allocate about $436,000 in accrued local grant funds and discussed next steps for outreach, application windows and restrictions intended to broaden recipient participation.
A committee the commissioners described as having scored applications independently and then voting unanimously recommended a slate of awards from the funds that must be allocated this year, the record shows. Committee members told the commission they received roughly a dozen applications in total, several of which were incomplete and were returned to applicants. The committee ultimately recommended seven business grants based on an independent scoring rubric that evaluated items such as job creation and pay.
Commissioners and committee members discussed improving public outreach to make more residents and businesses aware of the program and suggested a written memo to clarify commission priorities to the committee.
Key details discussed in the meeting: - Fund size and allocation window: The committee said approximately $436,000 in accrued funds needed allocation this year. Moving forward, the commission discussed a recurring annual allocation and opening a new application period immediately. - Grant caps and matches: The committee recommended a $50,000 maximum award per business and a match requirement of either 50% or 100% depending on the award type; applicants must submit receipts and post-performance documentation to receive funds. - Application completeness and scoring: Committee members described using a rubric that scored applications on factors such as number of jobs created and wage levels. Several incomplete applications were not scored because required information was missing. - Municipal planning grants: The committee recommended a portion of funds be set aside to help municipalities (specifically named in discussion: Fillmore and Delta) plan development areas and coordinate growth inside city limits. - Timing and reporting: The committee indicated the next application window is open and noted that allocations should be made by March so the program could be reported by July, per the timeline discussed in the meeting.
Commissioners discussed possible policy language restricting repeat awards to the same business or controlling awards to related entities and asked staff to provide clear direction to the review committee on those preferences.
No formal vote on the committee recommendations was recorded in the portion of the transcript provided; the commission treated the item as a discussion of recommendations and possible directions to the committee.
