Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cary committee directs staff to notify residents as it advances narrow‑street parking restrictions
Summary
Chief Finland presented a consolidated plan to address parking on narrow village streets (generally 18–20 feet), recommending one‑sided restrictions on many Class 3 and Class 4 roadways and staff outreach to affected property owners before bringing an ordinance to the Village Board.
Chief Finland, the Village of Cary presenter on parking, reviewed a multi‑street proposal to address vehicle and emergency‑access problems on narrow roadways and asked the committee for direction to notify affected property owners and return the proposal to the Village Board.
Nut graf: The discussion focused on standardizing on‑street restrictions rather than addressing individual complaints piecemeal. Staff recommended limiting parking on one side of many narrow streets (Class 4, roughly 18–20 feet wide), with exceptions and case‑by‑case reviews for other classes. Committee members supported outreach to residents ahead of any formal ordinance vote.
Finland said the board had previously handled similar one‑side restrictions for Sunset 2nd Street and parts of the Arrowhead subdivision and reported improved passage for school buses and fire apparatus. He presented a classification scheme (Classes 1–4) and illustrated why Class 4 streets – 18 to 20 feet wide – are most often impaired when cars park on both sides. He singled out specific local streets for proposed one‑side restrictions: Burton Avenue (18 ft, no curbs), Davis Lane (18 ft, ribbon curbs; restrict east/utility side), Short Street (cul‑de‑sac with a fire hydrant), sections of Park Avenue (areas east and west of Borden), parts of High Road (mixed widths, hydrants on north side) and several subdivision streets (Sunset 2nd, Arrowhead, Weaver, SilverTree Circle, Timber Terrace).
Finland also called out ordinance cleanup items in municipal code section 103.205 ("parking prohibited") where some listings reference features or drive accesses that no longer exist and where clearer, measured boundaries would replace vague references to "village limits." He proposed two overall policy options: (1) a standard restricting parking on one side of both Class 3 and Class 4 roadways, or (2) a narrower standard restricting only Class 4 roadways, with other requests handled case‑by‑case.
Committee discussion balanced safety and convenience. Several trustees said they were comfortable prioritizing Class 4 roadways but asked staff to present High Road in sections so areas that are wider could remain available for resident parking. Trustees and staff acknowledged some residents will lose on‑street parking and noted that curb/sidewalk installation in prior projects had required homeowners to expand off‑street parking to comply with driveway/sidewalk changes.
Outcome/direction: The committee asked staff to notify property owners along the candidate streets and return a refined draft for Village Board consideration (no ordinance enacted at committee level). The committee favored outreach and additional detail on High Road before a formal vote.
Ending: Staff will prepare mailed/electronic notifications to property owners on the candidate streets, collect input, and produce a revised ordinance draft and implementation timeline for the Village Board; the committee requested that outreach results be included in the Board packet.
