Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews work plan to consolidate Placerville historic-preservation resources on city website
Summary
Members of the Placerville Planning Commission reviewed a draft historic-guidelines work plan and discussed creating a single, searchable web page with GIS parcel mapping, consolidated documents and guidance for homeowners; no formal action was taken but commissioners outlined next steps and staff responsibilities.
The Placerville Planning Commission spent a substantial portion of its Tuesday meeting reviewing a historic-preservation work plan and discussing a proposal to consolidate historic-guidelines materials on the city website with an interactive GIS map showing parcels in the four historic districts.
Commissioner Stratton summarized edits to the work plan packet and described efforts to move inactive items to an archive while highlighting active tasks. Commissioners discussed communication options for informing property owners about historic-district status — including a potential utility-bill mailing — and noted limits on tax-credit eligibility: federal rehabilitation tax credits are generally available only for properties on the National Register used for income-producing purposes, a constraint commissioners said should be made clear in outreach materials.
Commissioners also reported progress on a GIS parcel map that would make all four historic districts searchable and recommended using a simple set of web tabs (general plan, development code, historic landmarks, application process, funding sources, FAQs) modeled after another jurisdiction to make resources easier for residents to find. Planning staff said she can update the city website and that the goal is to gather existing documents now scattered across the site into a single, navigable location.
Several commissioners said they would circulate drafts and compile existing inventories; one commissioner said a draft of standard historic-review findings will be revised and returned for commission consideration in December. A member of the public raised Brown Act concerns about commissioners exchanging documents outside of public meetings; staff responded that materials used in this work are distributed through the clerk and included on the meeting agenda packet for public review.
Commissioners requested that staff contact the county recorder or GIS staff to explore parcel-based mailings and agreed to continue working through the items in small steps. No vote was taken; commissioners said they will return with additional drafts and website examples at a future meeting.
