Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norristown approves camera expansion along Marshall Street; a resident raises privacy concern about a private camera
Summary
Council approved a purchase agreement to add five camera locations on the Marshall Street corridor using VIP grant funds; a resident separately asked the council to investigate an unmarked camera she said can see into homes on the 1200 block of Lucas and Wood Street.
Norristown Borough Council on Oct. 7 approved a purchase agreement to add five security camera locations and expand wireless infrastructure along the Marshall Street corridor, saying the hardware cost is primarily covered by a VIP grant the borough previously received.
A staff presenter described the purchase as "phase 2 of our community camera system," listing camera sites at Sweden/Marshall, Archer/Marshall, Violet/Marshall, Tremont/Marshall and Moore/Walnut. Staff said the bulk of the cost—$150,148—will be paid from the previously awarded VIP grant and that an additional $3,600 in IT costs will not be covered by the grant. Council approved Resolution 25‑84 by roll call.
During the public‑comment portion of the meeting, resident Shiretta Johnson said a recently installed spherical ("ball") camera on the 1200 block of Lucas and Wood Street appears to be pointed into homes. "I know this camera can see in my house," Johnson said. She said neighbors did not know who installed the device and asked that council or staff investigate who is responsible and what the camera records.
Council did not announce a formal action on the resident's camera inquiry during the meeting. The public‑safety presenter noted the Marshall Street phase‑2 installation will be covered primarily by the VIP grant the borough won earlier in the year. The presenter also said the new installations include warranties and an associated management fee for software and maintenance; staff will provide an implementation schedule and warranty terms as the project proceeds.
Why this matters: camera expansion is a visible public‑safety investment using grant funds; the resident’s complaint raises privacy concerns and points to the need to clarify ownership and data access for cameras visible from private property.
Next steps: staff listed an installation timetable and warranty coverage will follow; staff was asked to provide details on installation, software management and who to contact about privately installed cameras that may overlook homes.
