Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Augusta staff propose allowing halo-lit signs in downtown zoning districts
Summary
City administration presented a first-reading text amendment that would allow halo (backlit) signs in Downtown Mixed-Use (DTMU) 1 and 2 districts after a unanimous planning commission recommendation; council members asked questions about aesthetics, enforcement and precedent for other areas.
City Administrator Jim Clifford presented a first-reading ordinance to amend the North Augusta Development Code to allow ‘‘halo’’ (backlit) signage in the Downtown Mixed-Use 1 and 2 (DTMU 1 and 2) zoning districts.
Clifford said the change responds to requests from downtown businesses, including Augusta Oncology and a bridal sign company, and followed a unanimous recommendation for approval from the planning commission. "This request came from those bodies to the planning department, to craft a response," Clifford said, summarizing the commission and Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) outreach that produced the recommendation.
The measure would not permit traditional neon gas-tube signage. Instead it would add a definition to allow backlit or LED halo lighting behind sign faces so the light source is not directly visible. Clifford and staff said the amendment is intended as a limited, proof-of-concept change to a small area of the city (DTMU 1 and 2) before any broader code revisions.
Council discussion focused on tradeoffs between appearance and nuisance. One councilmember said, "I like the halo signs — you can see it's night and day, the difference," while others cautioned that any illuminated sign can look poor if lighting malfunctions. Clifford described the intent to limit the change to downtown so businesses outside DTMU districts would still need to seek BZA variances. He also said the amendment grew from specific BZA and planning-commission requests and technical presentations from sign vendors.
The planning staff and commission pursued independent technical input before forwarding the text amendment; Clifford recounted that sign manufacturers and local applicants presented on technical questions and that the planning commission then placed the item on its September 17 agenda and recommended approval.
The ordinance was presented for first reading during the study session; no final council vote was recorded at the meeting. Councilmembers asked staff to track possible signage impacts and to consider whether the downtown allowance should remain limited or become a broader code change later.
If the council advances the ordinance, affected property owners in DTMU 1 and 2 would be able to install halo-lit signs without BZA variances; applicants outside those districts would still need special permission.
