Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ogden City Tdr Vesting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends denying Ogden City request to vest 521 transferable development rights
Summary
Weber County planners voted 5-2 to recommend denial of Ogden Citys request to vest about 521 transferable development rights tied to a 24-acre well-field parcel, citing lack of a TDR ordinance framework and the need for transaction-level review.
The Weber County Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend denial of Ogden Citys request to vest roughly 521 transferable development rights (TDRs) associated with a 24-acre parcel that contains city wells.
Ogden City staff explained the request as an effort to preserve existing development rights identified in previous planning work and appraisals after the city purchased the well-field land. The city said the 521-unit figure is an estimate derived from the parcels highest-and-best-use calculations used during appraisal work and said the city did not intend to develop the well field but to hold rights that could be transferred to appropriate receiving sites in the future.
Planning staff and several commissioners disagreed with the approach. Commissioners noted the Ogden Valley general plan and the countys zoning code contemplate TDRs being processed and analyzed on a transaction-by-transaction basis: a sending parcel and a receiving site are evaluated together and a transfer is approved only after the receiving site, infrastructure and mitigation are documented. Several commissioners said the county does not have a comprehensive, standalone TDR ordinance that would support bulk vesting of units in perpetuity without an identified receiving site and detailed feasibility analysis.
Public commenters said the well field and the related protection zones have already limited some nearby private property ownersability to develop their land, and they urged the commission not to bestow broad new rights without a clear process or demonstration of feasibility. Commissioners additionally raised infrastructure questions: sewer, access roads and the financial feasibility of building that many units in the valley.
In a motion to deny, commissioners cited lack of alignment with the general plans required transaction-level TDR review, the absence of a TDR ordinance framework to handle the request and the applicants decision not to provide the market/feasibility information staff requested. The motion passed 5-2. Two commissioners voted in favor of sending a positive recommendation.
Ending: The Planning Commissions denial is a recommendation; the County Commission will receive the record and Ogden City may refile a more narrowly scoped request consistent with the countys code or propose a standalone TDR ordinance.
