Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Taxation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves tax-roll corrections; staff explains limited refund rules for city-owned exemptions

5845820 · September 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved tax-roll corrections as presented. Staff explained the county's process for tax-exemption refunds for city-owned properties, noting refunds are limited to the year of application and the prior year; amounts paid earlier remain with the taxing entity.

Riley County commissioners approved tax-roll corrections presented at the Sept. 29 meeting and heard staff explain how exemption refunds are processed for city-owned properties.

A staff member summarized the exemption situation for several city-owned parcels, saying those properties were city-owned (two acquired in 2019 and one in 2023) and that some were in flood zones. The staff explanation included how the county handles late exemption applications: "The way that works is the board will grant exemption back to 2019, but taxes are only abated for the year they applied and the prior year. So everything prior to that that was paid was a loss to the city. So, the application was received in 2024. The board grants that 2024 exemption. And if taxes have been paid, that prior year would also be refunded, but anything beyond that is not," the staff member said.

Nut graf: The commission moved and seconded to accept the tax-roll corrections as submitted and approved them by voice vote; staff clarified that retrospective refunds are limited to the application year and the year immediately prior, and earlier payments are retained by the taxing jurisdiction.

Body details: Commissioners briefly discussed the corrections and moved to approve the tax-roll corrections as presented; the chair called for the vote and commissioners responded "Aye." The transcript did not record a roll-call tally or dollar amounts for the refunds. Staff also noted two of the parcels had been in the floodplain and that some of the exemptions had been outstanding and were only processed after 2024 application.

Ending: The corrections were adopted by the commission; specific refund calculations and supporting documentation were not read into the record and should be available in county tax records or the assessor's office.