Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Agenda Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission recommendations: approvals and continuances from Aug. 28 meeting
Summary
The Oklahoma City Planning Commission recommended multiple rezones, PUDs and plats for approval, deferred several items and recommended denial on select cases. This roundup lists each action and the commission’s direction to City Council.
The Oklahoma City Planning Commission on Aug. 28 handled a long agenda of plats, rezones and PUDs. Several routine items were recommended for approval with staff technical evaluations; others were continued or drawn for public comment. This “votes at a glance” summary lists commission actions, movers and seconders where recorded and key conditions.
Items recommended for approval (recommendation to City Council): - PC 10981 (rezone 625 E. Eubank St. R1 to R2) — Motion to recommend approval moved by Commissioner Harrison; seconded by Commissioner LaForge; recommended for approval (no speakers). Applicant said the plan is for a duplex. - PC 10982 (rezone 629 E. Eubank St. R1 to R3) — Motion to recommend approval moved by Commissioner Harrison; seconded by Commissioner Govine; recommended for approval (no speakers). Applicant proposes multifamily units. - PUD 2091 (12635 N. Morgan Road; add administrative/professional office use) — Motion by Commissioner Noble, seconded by Commissioner Meek; recommended for approval subject to TE #1. - PUD 2095 (1404 NW 120th St.; convert congregate care to single-family/duplex) — Motion to recommend approval by Commissioner Harrison, seconded by Commissioner Noble; recommended for approval subject to technical evaluations and TE on access. - PUD 2057 (1325 E. Hefner Road) — Recommended for approval with amendments to technical evaluations (TE2 deleted, modify TE1 to require 1 stub to the east) after applicant and staff agreed to remove a requested double stub. - KC 7719 (preliminary plat Heffner Woods Phase 2 and variance) — Variance recommended first, then the preliminary plat recommended for approval subject to technical evaluations. - PUD 2093 (16901 N. Portland Ave) — Recommended for approval subject to TE #1. - SPUD 17-70 (14809 SE 140th; commercial development) — Recommended for approval after commission clarified driveway location per exhibit B and deleted a sentence from TE 1; commissioner motion passed with amended TE language. - SPUD 17-72 (1003 S. Pennsylvania) — Recommended for approval subject to improving alley to city standards where private access is taken; Urban Design Commission had unanimously recommended approval. - SPUD 17-71 (2620 S. Mustang Rd.) — Recommended for approval with four technical evaluations; applicant agreed to TE conditions. - SBUD 17-64 (2308-14 N. Florida Ave., Gatewood) — Recommended for approval subject to four TEs limiting access and driveway widths.
Items recommended for denial or failed approval: - CE 11-43 (vacation of portion of NW Twelfth St. ROW) — Initial motion to recommend approval failed; motion to recommend denial passed (see separate article). - SBUD 17-63 (12516 Roberts Rd.) — Recommended for denial after extensive neighbor opposition citing private road, drainage and recorded covenants (see separate article).
Continuances/deferred items (no substantive hearing today): - Items 22–25 (SPUD 17-59; SPUD 17-65; PUD 20-88; PUD 20-81) — Several Gatewood rezoning requests were listed as uncontested continuances and were deferred to September 11 or September 25 with public commenters invited to attend the later hearings. - Item 18 (CPA 20-2056) and 19 (PC 10977) — Deferred to January 15.
How votes were handled: For many routine rezonings and plats the commission moved to recommend approval to City Council and recorded the motion and seconder; technical evaluations (TEs) recommended by staff were typically included as conditions. For larger or contentious PUDs, commissioners negotiated additional conditions during the hearing and included them in the recommendation to City Council.
What to watch next: Items recommended for approval will be transmitted to City Council. Cases recommended for denial (Roberts Road SBUD 17-63) will also go to council where the applicant may appeal or revise. Deferred items will return to the commission’s September calendar.
Provenance: Multiple agenda items and votes appear through the transcript (select items discussed at times beginning 00:59:00 through 01:46:44).
