Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Approval topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hopkinton planning board approves 1-year extension for Brushy Brook preliminary plan
Summary
The Hopkinton Planning Board on Sept. 3 approved a one-year automatic extension of the preliminary plan approval for the 140‑lot Brushy Brook subdivision after hearing from the applicant and a public commenter who disputed the extension's timing.
The Hopkinton Planning Board voted to approve a one-year extension of the preliminary plan approval for the 140‑lot Brushy Brook subdivision, the board confirmed at its September meeting.
Bill Landry, representing the applicant, told the board the request was “an automatic request for an extension of the time period for the preliminary plan for an additional year in accordance with the state statute.” Landry said the recorded decision and a later consent order resolving an appeal set the controlling dates for the approval period.
The request drew a public comment from Joe Capalvo, who said the two‑year period runs from the date of approval and argued the application had expired. “So if you take 2 years from then, you end up with 08/24/2025. So he's late. This thing has expired,” Capalvo said. The town solicitor responded that state law ties the time clock to the date of recording, not the initial vote, and that the applicant’s interpretation was consistent with that reading.
Board members asked procedural questions and heard that the developer and planning staff have worked through a lengthy final‑plan submission and a list of deficiencies. Landry said the team and staff had held conferences and were close to resolving completeness issues so the board could begin final‑plan review.
A motion to approve the one‑year extension for the Brushy Brook preliminary plan carried; the board recorded the extension and moved on to other agenda items.
The extension gives the applicant additional time to address more than 30 conditions in the original decision and outstanding items on the final‑plan checklist. Landry said the project includes seven phases and that the final approval process is being structured so infrastructure for each phase is in place before lots are recorded.
No new permits or final approvals were granted at the meeting; the action before the board was solely the extension of the preliminary plan approval period.
