Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Summer School Programs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Gilbert Unified describes overhaul of in‑person secondary summer school; district aims to expand junior‑high offerings
Summary
District staff described multi‑year changes to in‑person secondary summer school — new curriculum pacing, instructional coaching, expanded junior‑high offerings and efforts to keep program tuition‑neutral — and reported enrollment and passing rates for recent summers.
District staff presented a multi‑year effort to redesign in‑person secondary summer school for students in grades 7–12, emphasizing aligned curriculum, instructional coaching and culture building to raise program effectiveness.
Assistant Superintendent Ryan Taylor introduced Danielle Fooks, secondary summer‑school principal, and Patricia (Tricia) Shores, the district’s dean of instruction for the summer program, who outlined operational changes and results.
Key changes described:
- Governance and staffing: The district moved secondary summer school under teaching and learning with consistent leadership rather than rotating deans; Fooks said summer‑school setup begins in October with stronger coordination across departments.
- Curriculum and assessment alignment: Curriculum coordinators built summer‑school pacing guides and maps tied to priority standards; staff aligned summer finals with common exams used during the regular year and integrated adopted curriculum platforms (e.g., ELA and math resources).
- Instructional coaching: Shores led teacher professional development that focused on using pre‑ and formative assessments, developing success criteria, and maximizing limited instructional minutes in condensed courses (two weeks per semester course).
- Culture and student supports: The program added open houses, campus‑specific deans for day‑to‑day issues, weekly PLCs and “College Day”/campus spirit practices to foster belonging; targeted interventions and outreach to families were used to reduce second‑day drops and nonattendance.
- Enrollment, outcomes and program goals: The district served 974 semester enrollments in 2024 and 854 in 2025; staff reported high summer passing rates overall but noted increased nonattendance and second‑day drops in 2025 and said some of those drops reflected students who had already secured alternative arrangements or passed and failed to formally withdraw. District staff plan improvements for McKinney‑Vento students, clearer communications, and better placement of special‑education students.
- Financial model and access: The in‑person program is tuition‑based ($200 per semester course with a 50% reduction for students who qualified for free/reduced‑price meals), with payment plans and social‑service supports available; staff said the goal is for secondary summer school to be self‑funding and that the district will manage class minimums to ensure financial viability while preserving access for students in need.
- Future priorities: Staff said junior‑high course expansion (including math‑bridge and English prep options) is a major focus for 2026 to provide remediation and first‑time credit opportunities. They also said Gilbert’s continuing to offer in‑person summer school is a competitive differentiator as neighboring districts move to online‑only models.
Board members asked about homework expectations (staff said most work is completed in class), meal availability (junior‑high site had nutrition services support; some high‑school sites rely on external meal pickup), transportation (regional bus stops available by request), teacher retention (many teachers returned year to year), and the program’s self‑funding status (staff expect the program will become budget neutral as enrollment and staffing stabilize).
Staff said the district will create a summer‑school dashboard to track student outcomes beyond summer school and inform curriculum and staffing decisions.
