Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County attorney asks for authorization to pursue court action over alleged commercial camping; board approves resolution
Summary
After months of local complaints about commercial camping at a lakeside property, county attorneys asked commissioners for authority to file suit if needed to enforce planning and zoning rules; commissioners debated enforcement, neighboring property impacts and veterans' program claims, and voted to approve a resolution authorizing further action.
The St. Louis County Attorney's Office asked the county board for authorization to initiate court action if necessary to enforce the county's planning and zoning ordinance against commercial camping activity on a lakeside property, the county attorney said.
"We think the right thing to do is to continue on with our request that we at least take authorization to bring the court action if needed," the county attorney said, explaining staff had received notice from the property owner late in the prior day and that the office had not been able to verify whether rental activity had actually ceased. The attorney said the office preferred to maintain authorization so it would not have to repeatedly return to the board if commercial activity resumed.
Several commissioners recounted constituent complaints and committee findings that the property had not complied with planning and zoning requirements. Neighbors and residents spoke at the meeting, calling for enforcement and describing quality‑of‑life impacts. A public commenter urged the board to reject a county lawsuit against a veterans program that rents sites, arguing the program serves veterans and that a lawsuit would harm veterans and taxpayers; the board heard multiple public comments both in favor of and opposed to enforcement.
Commissioners emphasized support for planning and zoning staff and the board's obligation to uphold ordinances. One commissioner said the planning and zoning decisions on the property had been made by the board's appointed committee and that the property was not in compliance; another commissioner warned against negotiating with an owner who had repeatedly ignored rules.
County staff said they had drafted a resolution authorizing the county attorney to file suit if compliance could not be verified or achieved; the attorney said he would amend the draft resolution to remove phrasing that assumed ongoing commercial rental activity if evidence showed the rentals had stopped. The board considered the amended resolution and approved it. "All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, same sign. Motion carries," the chair said after the vote.
Attorney and staff said they will continue discussions with the property owner's counsel and will verify compliance before initiating court action; if lawsuits are required, staff said they will only proceed after verification that other routes to compliance have been exhausted.
