Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tenants press council over slum management; council schedules ordinance discussions on multifamily inspections
Summary
Dozens of public commenters accused private management companies of unsafe rental conditions and urged inspections and enforcement; the council agreed to put proposed multifamily inspection ordinances on a future agenda and to pursue related enforcement measures.
A sustained wave of public comment on Aug. 6 focused on tenant complaints about property conditions, alleged slumlord practices and the effectiveness of code enforcement. Multiple residents and tenant organizers urged the City Council to adopt a city-level inspection program and to hold property owners accountable.
Speakers named several large management groups and pleaded for stronger city action. "These slumlords, they have a name," said Alisha Nash of the Inland Empire Tenants Union. "It's Bridge Management, IE Hightowers, and PAMA Management.... People have reported they have rats. They have...water to the point that they feel they're about to fall through the floor. They have mold in their house." Nash said she had canvassed tenant complaints over several days and offered to provide documentation to the city clerk.
Tenant advocates said code enforcement responses are inconsistent and accused some managers of retaliatory tactics when tenants complain. "When code enforcement doesn't do their job, who does this benefit? This benefits corporate slumlords," said Annabelle Navarez, president of the Inland Equity Community Land Trust and a local tenants organizer. Several tenants said they had filed complaints and received no inspection report.
Why it matters: Callers described health and safety problems that affect families and argue that defective housing contributes to overcrowding and, ultimately, homelessness. Witnesses asked the council to enact mandatory, city-administered inspections for multifamily properties and to strengthen oversight of code enforcement.
Council and staff response: Several council members acknowledged the complaints and asked staff for follow-up. During the meeting, Councilmember Sanchez and others moved a set of future agenda items; Item 19 — described at the meeting as an ordinance to require inspections for multifamily residential properties — was added to the future meeting list for further review. Council voted unanimously to place three future items, including Item 19, on future agendas for more detailed consideration.
Tenants submitted specific anecdotes: Ashley Bridal, a renter, described a complex with roach infestation, plumbing and electrical problems and said managers had not remedied long‑running health hazards. Esther Gonzales, also with the IE Tenants Union, described winning a legal action against her landlord but said she continued to face substandard conditions and a notice of rent increase. "We deserve to live in dignity, to not pay for these outrageous prices for these slums," Gonzales said.
Clarifications and next steps: Staff committed to providing council with information on code enforcement operations and to report back as the council advances any inspection ordinance. If the council proceeds with a mandatory inspection program, city staff said implementation details — funding, staffing, inspection frequency and legal design — would be developed for future council approval.
Provenance (transcript evidence): topicintro: public comment sequence beginning at transcript block 3058.1099 — multiple tenant speakers including Al Palazzo, Mike Hartley and others; topicfinish: council action to move future items at transcript block 8446.445 — "Motion passes unanimously."
