Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ethics And Civility topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Northampton County Council condemns political violence after hours of public calls to censure Councilwoman Kelly Keegan

5865483 · September 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Sept. 18 meeting, the Northampton County Council adopted a resolution condemning political violence after an extended public comment period that featured dozens of residents calling for Councilwoman Kelly Keegan to resign or be censured for social media posts celebrating an assassination.

Northampton County Council adopted a resolution condemning political violence and urging elected officials and residents to reject violent rhetoric after a night of extended public comment focused on Councilwoman Kelly Keegan and her social-media posts.

The resolution, introduced by Councilman David Giovanni, passed unanimously by roll call, 9-0. It denounced intimidation and threats against public officials and private citizens and urged elected leaders to “tone down inflammatory rhetoric” while reaffirming support for peaceful political discourse.

The vote followed roughly an hour-and-a-half of public comment in which multiple speakers called for Keegan—s resignation or censure. Christina Martinez, who identified herself as an Easton Area School District parent, told the council: “I never thought that I would have to stand here and ask our elected leaders to address something so basic, whether someone who openly spews hatred belongs in public office.” Hannah Kriwanis, a nursing student who said Keegan is employed as a nurse at Easton Area School District, said Keegan—s posts “glorify violence” and argued they are “utterly incompatible with holding elected office.”

Other speakers described personal trauma they said made Keegan—s remarks especially harmful. At least two speakers requested action short of removal, such as formal censure; others explicitly asked the council to demand Keegan—s resignation.

Council President Laurie Vargo Heffner told the public she had consulted the council solicitor and read from the Home Rule Charter and the council—s code of conduct. She said the council has limited authority over private conduct and noted a county social-media policy applies to employees but not to elected council members. "While we may disagree with my colleagues at times, either professionally or personally, I will continue to honor the code and the work of this body as a whole," she said.

During the council—s discussion of the resolution, several council members spoke to the broader context of political polarization and online speech. Councilman Ron Warren described the comments as "extremely, extremely insensitive" and said the murder that precipitated the debate had rattled residents across the political spectrum. Giovanni, who sponsored the resolution, said it was necessary given the current climate.

The resolution calls on law enforcement and the judicial system to investigate and prosecute incidents of political violence, to promote civil discourse, and to encourage elected officials to lead by example. The council also asked that resources be dedicated to protecting free and fair elections and supporting civic education.

Keegan did not engage in exchange on the floor during the public-comment period; council members acknowledged some remarks were directed at her and several said they hoped she would return to the dais to discuss the matter in person.

The council did not, at the Sept. 18 meeting, take formal disciplinary action such as removal or revocation of licensure; council members repeatedly noted removal of an elected official would require procedures not triggered by the private social-media posts as reviewed that evening.

The resolution passed by roll call; council minutes reflect the measure—s unanimous adoption.

The council scheduled no further formal action on disciplinary measures at the Sept. 18 meeting, though several speakers and at least one council member suggested exploring code-of-civility language or other procedural changes in future sessions.