Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Atchison County Commission actions on Sept. 30
Summary
Summary of motions and recorded outcomes from the Atchison County Commission meeting, including MOU approval, consent matters and payments.
Atchison County commissioners held a Sept. 30 meeting that included a series of routine and project-specific votes. The following is a concise list of motions taken and their recorded outcomes.
• Approval of agenda — Passed 2 to 0.
• Consent agenda (Sept. 23 meeting minutes and financial director's report) — Passed 2 to 0.
• Receive and file August EMS report (as presented by Corey Scott) — Passed 2 to 0.
• Memorandum of understanding with Project Concern — Motion to allow the chair to sign the MOU based on the appropriation approved by the commission; Passed 2 to 0. The chair indicated intent to attend Project Concern’s meeting and staff were asked to scan and send documents to Jeff Shealy ahead of the meeting.
• Payment request for Atchison Sports Complex (batting-cage concrete pad): Finance director said the project had received previous payments and requested approval of the remaining payment to complete that allocation. Motion to approve payment to S and M Construction (third supplemental bond trust) was approved 2 to 0. The transcript records two different spoken dollar figures in the discussion; the finance director said a remainder of about $15,007.31 would remain and later read a motion amount of $15,731.02. The exact final invoice amount should be confirmed in the written voucher before payment.
• Executive session under KSA 75-4319(b)(1) to discuss non‑elective personnel — Motion to recess to executive session for 30 minutes (with specified staff present) was approved 2 to 0; commissioners extended the session for another 30 minutes and returned to open session.
All votes recorded during the meeting were 2 to 0 in favor with one commissioner absent. Where motions were moved and seconded, the transcript records procedural confirmations but does not consistently name the mover and seconder. Where staff or contractors were referenced in motions, the meeting directed staff to proceed with signature and administrative follow-up steps.
