Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Police Leadership topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public comments divide over Police Chief Luis Lopez; police associations voice support, residents raise accusations
Summary
During the public‑comment period, multiple law‑enforcement associations and longtime employees expressed support for Police Chief Luis Lopez, while several residents leveled accusations and called for investigations. Council received the comments; no formal action was taken.
Public comments at the Montebello City Council meeting ranged from strong endorsements of Police Chief Luis Lopez to sharper criticisms and allegations from residents, with speakers representing internal police associations, long‑tenured department staff and private citizens.
Lieutenant William Molinari, speaking as vice president of the Montebello Police Management Association, read a letter expressing “strong and unwavering support for Police Chief Luis Lopez,” saying under his leadership the department has made “meaningful progress in key areas such as public safety initiatives, technology upgrades, expanding staffing levels” and officer wellness programs.
Monique Dalibovi, a nearly 37‑year civilian employee, said she had seen “a renewed sense of morale and unity” since Lopez’s arrival and urged the council to consider the broader picture of departmental changes.
Omar Rodriguez, president of the Montebello Police Officers Association, told the council the association had not solicited public speakers and that comments made at recent meetings represented individual views, not the association’s official position. Rodriguez said the MPOA remains focused on supporting department members and working collaboratively with leadership.
Other speakers were sharply critical. Raul Hurtado alleged Chief Lopez “solicited” supporters and said the chief “has no integrity,” without presenting documentary evidence during his remarks. During public comments Linda Nicholas said federal investigators are “here already investigating” Montebello; the council did not confirm or discuss an investigation during the meeting. Several speakers raised concerns about perceived favoritism and past personnel matters.
Council members did not take action on these non‑agenda comments. The public‑comment period included nine speaker cards for non‑agenda items; council acknowledged the range of opinions and moved on to other agenda business.
