Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Attendance Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews attendance rules and Indiana Open Door Law impacts for virtual meetings
Summary
The commission reviewed its bylaws and Indiana's Open Door Law limits on virtual attendance, including limits on consecutive virtual meetings and a 50% maximum of meetings attended remotely, and discussed enforcement and possible city legal guidance.
The Bloomington Commission on Sustainability discussed attendance and voting policy, focusing on requirements in the commission—s bylaws and in Indiana—s Open Door Law for electronic participation.
Chair Tara Dunderdale summarized the main points: commission bylaws discourage missing more than three consecutive meetings in a 12-month period and not missing four regularly scheduled meetings in a 12-month span. She also reviewed Open Door Law limits on virtual attendance, noting that a member cannot attend more than 50% of meetings in a year virtually and that a member may not attend three meetings in a row by electronic communication without a physical meeting in between.
Dunderdale said minutes must record whether a member attended in person or virtually, and that roll-call votes are required when members attend remotely. She said exceptions exist for illness, military service, medical conditions and certain emergencies.
Council Member Dave Rallo, participating as liaison, described the practical enforcement pathway: the council or clerk's office can notify absent members, and the commission could hold a removal discussion and vote if attendance violates bylaws. Dunderdale and other commissioners agreed that, where questions remain, they would ask the city attorney (through staff) to attend a future meeting to clarify legal implications and enforcement steps.
Commissioners flagged a current procedural issue: the chair noted she had recorded some votes earlier in the meeting for members whose virtual attendance might trigger bylaws limits and asked for guidance on how to proceed. Commissioners agreed to request legal clarification from city staff and to make sure minutes capture virtual/in-person status for each vote.
No formal action was taken; the commission agreed to request legal guidance from the mayor's office or city attorney and to be more explicit in minutes about attendance and vote recording going forward.
