Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Actions Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Rutherford County Schools board actions, Sept. 11 meeting
Summary
A roundup of motions and outcomes recorded at the Rutherford County Schools board meeting on Sept. 11, including reallocation of project funds, a training contract, a student transfer denial, and approval of extended bus contracts.
The Rutherford County Schools Board of Education recorded multiple formal actions during its Sept. 11 meeting. The board approved several routine and programmatic items; where recorded, outcomes are noted below.
- Reallocation of Rutherford Proud capital funds: The board approved a reallocation of $355,664.30 from the La Verne Middle indexed project to the Simon Springs Community School project within the "Fund 189" building program to close out accounts, as described by staff. Motion passed by voice vote.
- Orton-Gillingham / morphology training contract: The board approved a contract with the Institute for Multisensory Education to provide Orton-Gillingham and morphology training (five-day, cohort-based sessions) for classroom teachers, ESL teachers, special education teachers, and academic interventionists in the 2025-26 school year. The contract was described as not-to-exceed $89,112.50 and will be paid through Title II funds. Motion passed by voice vote.
- Transfer student under discipline: Under policy 6.318 (as cited in the public record), the director recommended denying admission to a student transferring from another school system who had been remanded for possession of illegal drugs. The board voted to deny the transfer per policy. Motion passed by voice vote.
- Extended bus contracts for power hours: The board approved extended-session bus contracts for power hours for the 2025-26 school year (compensation $245 per day). The board postponed a separate policy decision about whether contractor drawings for power-hour routes should be held once or twice per year; that procedural decision will return to a future meeting.
Other routine business included approval of the meeting agenda and the consent agenda earlier in the session.
Votes were recorded by voice; the board did not publish a roll-call tally for the items noted in the public minutes. Where the transcript recorded a named mover or seconder, it was not always associated with a formal roll-call tally in the public record.
