Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers continue talks on I‑75 industrial site; council to consider annexation and 50‑foot height special exception
Summary
Developers pursuing an industrial site near I‑75 have continued discussions with city staff; commissioners were given a draft plan of services, potential annexation impacts on Pleasant Grove Road maintenance, and a planning commission recommendation to allow up to 50-foot building heights along the I‑75 corridor.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City attorney and planning staff updated the board on an industrial site being pursued near I‑75. City staff said the prospective developer has continued due diligence and expects to finalize numbers before making an offer; the developer is evaluating water-supply capacity and possible infrastructure upgrades needed to meet an estimated 1,500 gallons-per-minute fire-suppression requirement.
Staff reported two options to meet water needs: upgrade the water line from a new tank under the interstate to a 12-inch main or provide an on-site water tower. The developer is also considering whether a TIF would be necessary; staff said the developer may not need TIF if other arrangements are satisfactory. Planning staff provided a draft plan of services and a planning commission recommendation on annexation and zoning.
A specific local effect: a short stretch of Pleasant Grove Road that fronts the annexation area is currently county-maintained; annexation would put that stretch under city maintenance and make it a city street. The planning commission recommended approval of zoning with a special exception to allow industrial building heights up to 50 feet along the I‑75 corridor (code typically limits building height to 35 feet). Staff noted the proposed special exception would be limited to industrial parcels along the corridor and would not change height limits in older M-1 areas elsewhere in the city.
Action and next steps: staff asked that the board place the annexation and zoning items on the Oct. 6 agenda (first reading on zoning allowed), and an ordinance (to be numbered 1058) was proposed for consideration; the board will consider utility capacity, annexation effects and potential infrastructure costs before final action.

