Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Cul De Sac Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board grants 300‑foot cul‑de‑sac variance for Pickrell/Pickel Pond Road subdivision after wide public comment
Summary
The board approved a variance allowing a 1,300‑foot cul‑de‑sac (300 feet longer than the ordinance limit) to enable a 26‑lot clustered subdivision on a 150‑acre parcel; residents raised concerns about wetlands, road condition and drainage, and applicants and engineers said state and planning review will address stormwater and septic issues.
The Laconia Zoning Board of Adjustment granted a variance to allow a cul‑de‑sac of 1,300 linear feet where the zoning ordinance limits cul‑de‑sacs to 1,000 feet, a change applicants said is needed to avoid wetlands and to enable a clustered subdivision of 26 single‑family lots on a 150‑acre parcel off Pickrell Pond Road.
Attorney Sean Dunfee, representing Parade REI LLC, introduced the application and said the design concentrates development to reduce road length and wetland impacts. Engineer Nick Loring told the board the proposal will require state review: "we are automatically need to apply to NHDES alteration terrain," he said, adding that NHDES and the TRC review process address stormwater volume, flow rates and infiltration requirements.
Attorney John Cronin, who has worked with the applicants, told the board a project of this type will face rigorous New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) review and that, in his view, the cul‑de‑sac limit historically reflects fire‑equipment constraints; he said the fire department has indicated it will accept the design if fire cisterns are provided.
Residents from Pickrell Pond Road and adjacent properties spoke at length. Common concerns included wetlands and wildlife habitat, increased runoff into Pickerel Pond, the condition and weight limits of Pickrell Pond Road (a 10‑ton limit), and potential impacts from heavy construction traffic. Dave Ouellette, who said he has owned property on the road for decades, presented photos of wetlands and described recurrent drainage and road‑base problems; he told the board the nearby wetlands feed into Pickerel Pond.
Applicants and engineering staff responded that the cluster design concentrates development in the buildable area, that septic systems and wells will be regulated by state agencies, and that the plan includes open‑space/conservation acreage. Loring said the project team discussed fire protection with the department and that required cisterns (the engineer noted designs in the meeting approximated 30,000‑gallon cisterns) would address fire‑safety access beyond 1,000 feet.
After public comment and applicant rebuttal, a board member moved to grant the variance for application ZB2026‑010. The motion carried after a second; one board member recorded an abstention on the vote. The transcript records the motion passed but does not show a full roll‑call tally of yes and no votes.
Board members and staff repeatedly noted that many of the specific concerns raised — stormwater design, septic approvals, traffic and road repairs — are reviewed and permitted at the planning board and state levels and that those processes will include public notice and additional hearings. Public works and planning staff said impact fees, preconstruction meetings and security for road repair would be part of the planning and construction review if the subdivision proceeds.
