Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing And Growth topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commissioner warns 1,000 approved homes raise questions about water supply, affordability and school capacity
Summary
Barbara Hill, a member of Lemoore's Planning Commission, told council during public comment that about 1,000 homes approved for the city prompt concerns about water sources, affordable housing availability, and school capacity; she urged the council to consider those issues in future decisions.
Get email alerts on the Housing And Growth topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Barbara Hill, who identified herself as vice chair of the Lemoore Planning Commission (speaking in a personal capacity), urged the City Council to consider water supply, affordability and school capacity as development proposals proceed.
Hill said the commission had discussed roughly "a thousand new homes that are slated to that have been already been approved and are slated to be built in L'Amour" and asked the council where the water to serve those homes would come from. She referenced local watering restrictions and asked whether water would be taken from agricultural uses.
Hill also raised concerns about affordability. She said the builders discussed at a recent planning meeting plan to offer mainly smaller floor plans—about 1,300, 1,400 and 1,500 square feet—on roughly 4,000-square-foot lots with prices starting at about $350,000. Hill said that, based on her calculations, buyers would need a $70,000 down payment and roughly $70,000 annual income to afford one of those homes; she contrasted that to an average Kings County wage she cited as $43,446 and said many local workers could be priced out.
On education and recreational infrastructure, Hill noted she did not see plans for additional schools or parks to absorb the new population. She told council that the city needs to consider school capacity and recreational facilities as part of community planning.
Mayor interrupted the public comment at one point to note Hill had exceeded the usual three-minute limit; Hill offered to speak with staff after the meeting to discuss further.
Council did not take action on the concerns raised during public comment; Hill asked to follow up with staff and Council afterward.

