Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lemoore council approves consent calendar; tables golf course fund reclassification and document-management contract for more information
Summary
Council approved most consent items in a single vote, approved Measure S sales-tax reporting item separately, and voted to table two items — reclassification/closure of the golf course enterprise fund and a records-management contract/conversion — until the next meeting to allow further financial and technical clarification.
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lemoore City Council approved the bulk of the Sept. 16 consent calendar in a single motion but pulled three items for separate discussion: Measure S sales-tax reporting (4-4), the golf course fund reclassification (4-6), and a document-management vendor agreement and conversion (4-8).
The council approved the remainder of the consent calendar (items 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-5, 4-7, 4-9, 4-10, 4-11 and 4-12) in one vote. The motion was made by Council member Cruz and seconded by Council member Lyons; the motion passed 4–0 with one absent.
Item 4-4 (Measure S sales-tax reporting) was discussed briefly by finance staff in response to a council request and then approved in a separate vote, 4–0 with one absent. Staff reported that first-quarter Measure S receipts exceeded budget by $68,000 on a budgeted total of $960,000.
Council extensively discussed item 4-6, a staff proposal to close the golf course enterprise fund and reclassify its balances into the general fund. Staff explained the golf course has been leased to a third-party operator and that the enterprise fund has run a long-standing negative balance that staff proposes to reclassify as a general-fund liability with an interfund loan. Finance discussion in public comment noted the negative balance would not disappear on reclassification and that the general fund would show the liability until lease payments reduce the balance over time; one commenter suggested the transfer does have an immediate fiscal effect on the general fund and should not be described as "no fiscal impact." Council asked for a payoff schedule and additional details. Council member Brewster made a motion to table item 4-6 to the next meeting; the motion passed 4–0 with one absent.
Item 4-8, a proposed vendor agreement to replace the city's legacy document-management system and to convert archives, was also pulled for questions about vendor architecture, backup and storage limits and conversion hours. Staff said the existing system (referred to in the staff presentation as Questies) is on-premises and requires an update estimated at $25,000; staff presented a cloud alternative described as lower annual cost and more user friendly. Public commenters and council members requested details on storage allocation, backup redundancies and vendor responsibilities for data protection; staff noted the conversion vendor quoted a conversion service (roughly $14,500 in exhibit figures) and that the proposed cloud service carries an annual license cost lower than the on-premises vendor. Council member Cruz moved to table item 4-8 until the next meeting to allow staff and IT to obtain the vendor answers; the motion passed 4–0 with one absent.
On new business (6-1), the council appointed a voting delegate and alternate for the League of California Cities annual conference: Council member Cruz was designated the primary voting delegate and Council member Brewster the alternate; the nomination and vote were unanimous among present members (4 in favor, 1 absent).
The council also set closed-session items and adjourned into closed session at the end of the meeting.

