Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Government Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Placerville council opts not to change planning commission’s bylaw approval authority, asks staff to monitor
Summary
After public comment and council discussion, the council directed staff to keep the planning commission’s existing authority to adopt its bylaws while alerting the council if bylaws propose items that would require additional staff time or conflict with state law.
The Placerville City Council on Sept. 23 reviewed whether the planning commission should retain authority to adopt its own bylaws or whether the council should require council approval for planning-commission bylaws.
City staff presented background and a draft update to planning commission bylaws prepared in 2023, noting required Brown Act updates for teleconferencing and public-comment protocols (AB 557 and AB 2449, 2024). The city attorney’s review noted one proposed rule in the draft — a quorum definition requiring a majority of the total commission rather than a majority of a quorum — that exceeds standard practice and could prevent routine business when vacancies or absences occur.
Members of the public and several speakers urged the council to leave bylaw approval with the planning commission to preserve the commission’s operational independence and efficiency. “It undermines the appearance of independence on the part of a commission,” Kirk Smith said, urging the council to return the matter to the commission. Other commenters said bylaws are typically routine housekeeping, chiefly covering agenda order and officer elections, and should not require council approval.
Council members voiced two recurring concerns: that bylaws must comply with the Brown Act and state law, and that planning-commission activities should not direct additional staff workload without council review. Several council members said they were comfortable leaving bylaw approval with the commission so long as the city attorney reviews bylaws for state-law compliance and staff alerts council when bylaw changes would create extra staff demands or propose voting thresholds that exceed government-code standards.
The council’s direction was to leave the planning commission’s authority in place for now, require the city attorney review of draft updates for legal compliance, and ask staff to provide an annual informational item (red-line version) or bring problematic proposed changes to the council for guidance. Council members emphasized that if a proposed bylaw change would require additional staff time or create legal exposure it should be brought to the council for decision.
