Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Licensing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee recommends change to operators-license policy to allow administrative corrections and one-year reapply bar
Summary
The committee recommended the Village Board adopt an amended operators-license approval policy that allows the public safety chief to request corrected applications before administratively denying them, establishes a one-year wait before reapplying after denial, and requires appeals within 30 days of a denial letter.
The Village of Ashwaubenon Public Works and Protection Committee on Sept. 2 voted to recommend that the Village Board adopt amendments to the village operators-license approval policy. The changes give the public safety chief discretion to allow applicants to correct inadvertent omissions on alcohol operator license applications and add time limits on reapplication and appeals.
Under the proposed amendment, when an applicant's background check identifies an omission on an application the chief may first contact the applicant and allow a corrected resubmission (with a resubmission fee) instead of immediately issuing an administrative denial. Joel explained the change as a way to give the chief “an opportunity to have a conversation with that applicant in advance of issuing their denial.”
The amendment also adds that an applicant who is denied may not reapply for at least one year from the date of denial. If the applicant appeals the denial, the effective denial date is the date of the final appeal decision. Finally, the amended policy requires that any appeal of an administrative denial be filed within 30 days of the date on the denial letter; the clerk's office will date the denial letter and that date, not the postmark or receipt, starts the 30-day window.
Committee members discussed the volume of operator license applications and review workload. Staff said the clerk's office begins background checks and would forward records to public safety; since July 1 the office had seen 41 submissions. Committee members noted the full licensing cycle involves several hundred applicants: staff described a two-year licensing cycle with about 450–500 applicants for the period that covers license renewals and initial applications.
Members also discussed using a designee to relieve the public safety chief's workload; committee language recommended adding “chief or designee” so that a member of command staff could handle administrative reviews when the chief is unavailable. Chief Rolling and other staff agreed that phrasing would be acceptable.
The committee voted to recommend adoption of the amended policy to the Village Board; the meeting record shows a motion, a second and a voice vote in favor. The record does not contain a roll-call vote tally. The committee did not vote to change the village code; it recommended that the Village Board adopt the drafted policy amendment.
