Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Los Banos council backs roundabout for Vineyard Drive–State Route 165 intersection, directs staff to proceed
Summary
After community meetings and technical review, the council selected a single-lane roundabout as the preferred alternative for the Vineyard Drive / State Route 165 intersection, citing improved traffic flow and safety. Council voted 3–1 in favor of the roundabout; one member preferred a traffic signal.
Get email alerts on the Transportation Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Los Banos City Council on Sept. 17 directed staff to pursue a single-lane roundabout as the preferred intersection control for the planned Vineyard Drive connection to State Route 165, citing traffic-flow performance and crash-severity reductions in technical analysis presented to the council.
City staff and consultants presented two main alternatives — a signalized four‑way intersection and a single‑lane roundabout with truck apron — and summarized results from traffic modeling, safety studies and public outreach. Staff said the roundabout showed faster intersection throughput in both near-term (2026) and long-term (2046) modeling and cited national studies showing substantial reductions in fatal and serious‑injury crashes at roundabouts because of fewer high‑speed, right‑angle (T-bone) collisions.
Public safety and truck access were focal points during debate. Fire and police leaders spoke to the council; Fire Chief (Chief Tewalla) said the department favored a roundabout because it slows traffic on approach and improves pedestrian safety. Staff said the proposed roundabout design would include a truck apron and be sized so STAA‑class trucks could navigate the feature. Project costs remain preliminary; staff estimated roundabout construction could be 20–30% less than signalized intersection alternatives, while noting that right‑of‑way and utility impacts would be similar for both options.
Council direction: By recorded preference the council selected the roundabout alternative (Sanders: roundabout; Chavez: roundabout; Lewis: signalized four‑way; Amabill: roundabout). Staff said it will complete detailed design, environmental review and pursue funding (including Measure V, CMAQ and developer impact fees), with community engagement phased during design.
Why it matters: The connection would create a formal north‑south/east‑west route in a growing part of the city and is intended to improve circulation and emergency response times. The selected alternative will guide environmental compliance, design and grant-seeking.
Next steps: Staff will proceed with detailed design and environmental review and return to council with funding options and design-level cost estimates. Community outreach on traffic impacts and construction staging is planned for 2028 when design and traffic studies are more complete.

