Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Palm Beach County votes 5–2 to terminate MacArthur-funded Safety & Justice Challenge grants; criminal justice advocates urge reversal
Summary
Palm Beach County commissioners voted 5–2 to terminate two remaining MacArthur Foundation Safety & Justice Challenge grants, end related contracts and discontinue two evaluation studies, prompting strong objections from criminal justice advocates who said the county risked losing effective programs that had already reduced jail stays and missed court appearances.
Palm Beach County commissioners voted 5–2 on October 9 to terminate two remaining MacArthur Foundation Safety & Justice Challenge (SJC) grants and to end contracts tied to those funds, a decision that drew strong public comments from criminal justice reform advocates and CJC partners.
The board action (agenda item 3 Q 2) instructed staff to receive and file grant close‑out information, terminate the county’s SJC sustainability and capstone grants, terminate a first‑amendment memorandum with a court‑notification vendor and a first amendment to a public defender agreement, discontinue 2 Urban Institute studies, and delete two county positions that had been funded through SJC grants. Commissioners approved the motion after public comment and an extended discussion on the effect of ending the grant relationship with the MacArthur program.
County staff and some commissioners said the decision was intended to restore trust among system stakeholders and to give the county greater flexibility to set local criminal justice priorities.
Why the county moved to end the SJC grants Deputy administrators and staff described a sustained effort to restore the participation of law‑enforcement stakeholders at Criminal Justice Commission (CJC) meetings. Staff argued that some partners had stepped back from CJC work partly because of the emphasis placed on initiatives funded through the SJC grants and that moving away from the MacArthur umbrella would allow the county and the CJC to reframe priorities and bring missing stakeholders back to the table.
“I think getting law enforcement to the table should be a priority to the CJC,” Commissioner Joel Flores said, arguing staff should have the flexibility to “advance the inevitable” sunsetting of SJC funding and to pursue locally determined programs.
Public commenters and CJC members urged the board not to abandon the grants and to preserve effective programs funded by SJC, including court‑date text reminders and a mobile probation unit. Regina Herring, former executive director of the Criminal Justice Commission, said: “It would be an unprecedented misstep to start giving away philanthropic, non public dollars s that are meant for, partnerships.” Several nonprofit leaders and former CJC chairs described a decade of planning and progress and sought a phased approach rather than an immediate termination.
Commissioners who opposed ending the grants warned that stopping the funds could put proven programs at risk. Commissioner Melissa Weiss asked staff to return quickly with a plan to preserve elements the board wants to continue, including the court‑date text reminder work. Staff said existing contracts could be renegotiated in some cases and that two positions might be reassigned within county government where feasible.
Vote and formal actions - Motion: a multi‑part motion to (a) receive and file grant…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

