Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
PUC of Nevada grants NV Energy petitions, modifies July 9 order in docket 24-4003
Summary
The Public Utilities Commission of Nevada granted petitions for reconsideration and clarification from Nevada Power Company and Sierra Pacific Power Company (both doing business as NV Energy) in docket 24-4003 and modified a July 9 order; the motion passed unanimously.
Get email alerts on the Utilities Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Public Utilities Commission of Nevada on the agenda meeting granted petitions for reconsideration and clarification filed by Nevada Power Company doing business as NV Energy and Sierra Pacific Power Company doing business as NV Energy in docket 24-4003 and modified an order originally issued July 9, 2025. Commissioner Cordova moved the modified draft order, Commissioner Brown seconded it, and the motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Cordova, who presented the item, described the filing as an annual report and explained the commission's action. “Item 2 b is docket number 24Dash4003. It is a filing by Nevada Power Company doing business as NV Energy and Sierra Pacific Power Company doing business as NV Energy of the annual report on the quality of service metrics and compliance with the order issued in docket number Fifteen-six64. The order before you is, considering the petitions for reconsideration and clarification that were filed in this docket and, it does grant those petitions and suggests a couple of modifications to the final order that we had previously adopted,” Commissioner Cordova said.
The commission voted to grant the petitions as modified by the draft order and to amend the prior July 9 order. The transcript does not specify the exact textual changes made to the July 9 order or the substance of the modifications beyond the statement that the petitions were granted and “a couple of modifications” were suggested.
No public comment was recorded on this item during the meeting. The commission took a formal recorded vote: the motion was moved by Commissioner Cordova, seconded by Commissioner Brown, and supported by Chair Hilly Williamson; the vote was announced as “Aye” by all three members and the motion carried.
The commission did not provide additional details in the public record during the meeting about implementation steps, compliance deadlines, or reporting changes resulting from the modified order. Any party or member of the public seeking the specific order text or the modified findings should consult the commission’s docket filing for 24-4003 or the commission’s posted order for the precise language and any instructions to the utilities.
