Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Sentence Parole topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Short sentence parole: commission reports continued low misconduct and lower recidivism among participants
Summary
Research staff presented an updated evaluation of Pennsylvania's Short Sentence Parole (SSP) program showing program participants have far fewer misconducts and lower reconviction rates than the general DOC population, generated substantial bed‑day savings and concentrated participation from less populous counties.
Commission research staff presented updated findings from the evaluation of the Department of Corrections' Short Sentence Parole (SSP) program, reporting continued evidence of lower misconducts and lower reconviction rates for SSP participants compared with the general DOC population.
Staff summarized how SSP works: it identifies inmates with short sentences (median 12–36 months), no violent or certain disqualifying offenses, and relatively low risk; DOC prepares a reduced parole package earlier in custody and the board conducts review so eligible individuals can be released at their minimum date rather than waiting later parole interviews.
Key updated findings included: - Program scale: the program expanded after an initial COVID-era rollout; by 2022 more than 500 inmates a year were candidates for SSP. - Bed‑day and fiscal effects: SSP participants reduced more than 60,000 bed days per year in early evaluations, which staff estimated translated to about $2,750,000 in annual savings for DOC (figure reported by staff based on earlier evaluation methods). - Misconducts: SSP participants commit significantly fewer misconducts than the general DOC population — staff reported approximately nine times fewer misconducts overall and about twenty times fewer serious misconducts in earlier analyses; that pattern remains in updated reviews. - Recidivism: three‑year reconviction rates for SSP participants remain low in interim analysis and substantially lower than the overall DOC population; staff are finalizing a full recidivism analysis for publication. - Demographics and lead offenses: SSP participants skew older and are more likely to be white than the general DOC population; lead offenses concentrated in substance‑related charges (PWID and DUI) and theft, and rural counties (fourth through eighth class) appear overrepresented relative to their share of the overall DOC population.
Staff said next steps include finalizing the longer‑term recidivism analysis, expanding analysis of in‑custody programming data (DOC provided more granular program records this round), and completing a cost‑benefit analysis and implementation recommendations.
Ending: Staff will incorporate the extended follow‑up results, refine program and cost estimates, and present final evaluation results to the commission in a future session.
