Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Edtech topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Quakertown board hears lengthy debate over IXL rollout as teachers, parents report confusion

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Quakertown Community School District administrators described a phased rollout of the IXL personalized-practice platform for grades 2–8 and Algebra students at the Sept. 24 board meeting, and fielded extended questions from board members and parents about teacher training and how the district will monitor students who become “stuck.”

Quakertown Community School District administrators told the school board on Sept. 24 that the district has begun a phased implementation of IXL, an online personalized-practice platform, for grades 2–8 and Algebra students and that seven school buildings are using the platform during the current phase of rollout. The presentation prompted extended questions from board members and parents about teacher training, how teachers will track and respond to student progress and how much time students should spend on devices during “pride” or intervention periods.

District Director of Teaching and Learning Kelly Kramer and district coordinator Brett Farley described IXL as a diagnostic and practice tool that creates individualized action plans for students after a beginning-of-year benchmark. “IXL is flexible. Meaning, we can use it flexibly for instruction,” Kramer told the board, and Farley added in summary: “So in summary, IXL and QCSD is a tool for personalized learning, progress monitoring, and instructional decision making.”

Why it matters: Board members said they received parent and teacher questions after the district began the platform in September and asked for clearer routines and faster capacity-building so teachers can use the platform’s data to support struggling students. Several board members said the rollout felt premature because not all interventionists, coaches and principals had completed formal vendor training.

What administrators said: Kramer and Farley outlined a phased plan they described as “implementation phase 1.” That plan includes a beginning/middle/end-of-year benchmark, weekly progress updates and teacher routines that set a “must do/may do” structure for pride time. The district’s stated implementation details: teachers should help students focus on their lowest strand, students should enter IXL at least once per week and aim for proficiency in two skills, and teachers will set goal-setting routines and celebrate student progress. Kramer said the district has been using the platform about four weeks.

Farley described the professional development timeline: teacher training was provided in August; interventionists and coaches attended training last week; and principals were scheduled for a training the following Friday. The rollout currently covers seven buildings, Farley said.

Board concerns and clarifications: Board President Troy Hippoff and other members pressed administrators on three recurring themes: (1) whether enough staff were trained before students and teachers began using IXL; (2) how teachers and interventionists will identify and help students who become “stuck” in the platform; and (3) whether students and parents understand how IXL fits into grades or classroom expectations.

“How does the teacher know if a student is sitting there in the arena and they are stagnant in the arena?” Hippoff asked at the meeting, reflecting concerns heard from parents at back-to-school nights. Kramer and Farley demonstrated that IXL includes a “live classroom” view that lets a teacher see which students are active, how many problems they answered and who is stuck — a view Kramer said teachers can use to cue small-group instruction. Farley said the building interventionist is intended to be the first line of ownership for IXL data, with core-content teachers and principals using the data to decide next steps. Instructional coaches will support teachers in translating the data into instruction.

Parents and stakeholders: Several board members relayed feedback from parents who saw “IXL” listed on back-to-school-night slides without sufficient explanation. Administrators acknowledged communication gaps and described ongoing parent outreach: summer/fall PTO visits, a weekly district newsletter (“Take 5 with Dr. Friedman”), and forthcoming education-committee presentations with deeper data and screenshots.

Limits and next steps: Kramer stressed that IXL is one of multiple data sources and not the sole driver of instruction. She said the district is phasing in IXL deliberately and will return to the Education Committee with a deeper presentation including screenshots and data. Board members asked for clearer month-to-month milestones, examples of student goals, and confirmation that the district will provide additional embedded professional development and coach-led support to scale teacher capacity.

Ending: Administrators said they would continue teacher training, provide more parent communication and present a more detailed data-driven session to the Education Committee. Board members expressed support for the platform’s goals but asked for faster, clearer training and tighter communication with families so IXL’s results translate into classroom interventions.