Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Bicycle Ordinance O2025 33 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee pauses on downtown bicycle rules; debate centers on e-bikes, enforcement and 10 mph limit

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The MSFI committee continued discussion of proposed bicycle rules (ordinance O-2025-33), heard extensive public comment about electric bicycles and scooters, and voted unanimously to place the ordinance on more time so staff and the city attorney can draft revisions and return with an education plan.

The Keene Municipal Services, Facilities & Infrastructure Committee deferred action on proposed rules for operation of bicycles in the downtown bike lanes and multiuse paths, agreeing to return the ordinance for further drafting and to allow staff to present an education and outreach plan to the committee.

The draft ordinance would require bicyclists to follow state law and add specific local rules for downtown bike lanes and multiuse paths, including a proposed 10 mph speed limit in the downtown core (some committee members and bicycle advocates had suggested an 8 mph limit). The draft also addresses one-way travel in bike lanes, parking and storage of unattended bicycles, and night lighting or reflectors.

Why it matters

The rules will govern the soon-to-be-constructed downtown bike lanes that are part of a larger multimodal downtown infrastructure project. Committee members, business owners, residents and bicycle advocates said the ordinance must balance pedestrian safety, vulnerable road users and enforcement practicality.

Key points from the meeting

- Enforcement concerns: Multiple council members and members of the public said enforcement will be difficult. One committee member urged that the city should not pass an unenforceable ordinance, saying, "I don't think we're gonna have any police down there with radar." Councilor Filio was direct: "I will not vote for any ordinance that allows anything with a motor on the path downtown."

- E-bikes and state law: The city attorney explained distinctions in state law: class 1 and class 2 electric bicycles may be treated as bicycles for sidewalk access in many circumstances, while class 3 e-bikes are not allowed on sidewalks. The attorney said a municipality may, however, prohibit class 1 and class 2 e-bikes on a particular bicycle or multiuse path if the local authority chooses to do so.

- Safety and design: Bicycle-pedestrian advocates said that separated bike lanes and good design reduce conflicts and injuries. Andy Holt of the Bicycle Pedestrian and E systems committee (BPEC) argued that separated infrastructure and clear rules would protect people who rely on wheeled mobility, including children and people with disabilities.

- Education and outreach: Deputy City Manager Rebecca Landry described a communications plan that will include printed materials for downtown merchants, lamppost signage at eye level, social media, a web page and QR codes to guide public behavior and awareness of rules.

Committee action

After extended public comment and internal discussion, the committee moved and voted unanimously to put the ordinance on more time so the city attorney and staff could draft language addressing motorized devices and return with an updated draft and the education plan. The committee did not adopt final speed limits, nor did it enact a prohibition on powered devices at this meeting.

Clarifying details

The draft ordinance in the packet recommended a 10 mph cap in the downtown core; Bicycle Pack had recommended 8 mph. The draft references state equipment rules (RSA 266:85–89) and city code language concerning bicycle operation on sidewalks (city code section cited in packet as §94-466). Committee members repeatedly flagged enforcement practicality and asked staff to return with revised language that could address powered scooters and skateboards, permitted e-bike classes, and education materials.

Ending

Staff and the city attorney will prepare a revised ordinance draft addressing motorized devices and present a public-education plan to the committee. The committee asked that the education package be provided as an informational document in members’ mailboxes ahead of the next substantive discussion.