Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Emergency Communications topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Carroll County officials discuss phased radio upgrade amid uncertain grant coverage

5826041 · September 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff outlined a multi‑year plan to upgrade emergency radios and communications infrastructure, saying the Kentucky Department of Homeland Security grant likely will require a phased approach and local cost‑sharing; total replacement of vehicle radios could exceed available grant amounts.

Carroll County Fiscal Court members spent substantial time reviewing options to upgrade the county's emergency radio system and radios in vehicles, concluding a phased approach will likely be needed because grant coverage and total costs are uncertain.

County staff said the Kentucky Department of Homeland Security radio grant would probably fund radios but not all tower or repeater infrastructure, and that the county should expect to pursue funding over multiple years. Staff estimated a single‑round allocation for radios in Kentucky could be roughly $150,000–$190,000; countywide replacement needs were described well above that amount, with one summary estimate for mobile and vehicle radios approaching $500,000.

The court's emergency management staff recommended dividing the project into phases: begin with replacing local handheld and mobile radios, return to the state for additional phases to cover repeaters and other infrastructure, and work with partner jurisdictions to define cost‑sharing. Staff also said the grant is reimbursable, so the county must plan for upfront costs and intergovernmental cost allocations.

Court members discussed seeking technical advice from a Scott County official who has experience with the grant approval process. Staff recommended caution: different sources provided slightly different guidance on what the grant will cover (local radios versus repeaters and related equipment). The court did not take a formal vote to commit funds; staff were directed to continue refining estimated costs, confirm what equipment the grant will reimburse, and coordinate with cities and other county partners on cost‑sharing options.

Why it matters: county emergency communications affect police, fire and EMS interoperability across jurisdictions. The court flagged the grant's limits and the county's need to plan for multiple funding rounds and for potential local contributions.

What’s next: staff will continue grant application work, refine equipment counts and cost estimates, and report back to the court with a proposed phased plan and a cost‑sharing framework.