Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Tammany Parish Board of Review reconvenes, affirms multiple property assessments
Summary
At a Sept. 4, 2025 special meeting, the St. Tammany Parish Board of Review closed out assessment hearings and unanimously affirmed assessed values for multiple properties; one assessment was decreased.
The St. Tammany Parish Board of Review reconvened Sept. 4, 2025, to close out previously recessed assessment hearings and affirmed assessed values for multiple properties, the board said at a special meeting.
"This meeting is to reconvene the board of review that was convened and recessed on Thursday, 09/04/2025. All assessment hearings have been completed, and the board of review will be closed out at this special meeting," a board member said at the start of the session.
The board moved through a list of assessment items, taking a motion and second on each and recording each vote as unanimous with three members absent. Most motions were made and seconded by board members Corbin and Laughlin, among others. One item — an assessment for Michelle Robinson — was recorded as decreased to $43,796.
Board action: The board considered a sequence of assessment items identified by assessment numbers and property names in the meeting record. For each item, a motion to affirm (or, in one case, decrease) the stated assessed value was made, seconded and approved. The recorded outcome for each vote was "unanimous with 3 absent." The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn by Miss Smith.
Votes at a glance
- Slidell LLC (assessment no. 92401): affirmed total assessed value $108,931. Motion by Corbin; second by Laughlin. Outcome: approved (recorded as unanimous with 3 absent).
- Slido LLC (assessment no. 92455): affirmed total assessed value $480,485. Motion by Laughlin; second by Corbin. Outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
- Slido LLC (assessment no. 92398): affirmed total assessed value $500,060. Mover/second not clearly identified in the transcript. Outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
- Slido LLC (assessment no. 92402): affirmed total assessed value $135,181. Motion by Miss Tanner; second by Mister Smith. Outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
- Slido LLC (assessment no. 92399): affirmed total assessed value $4,879. Motion by Mister Corbin; second by Mister Laughlin. Outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
- Slido LLC (assessment no. 92400): affirmed total assessed value $5,489. Motion by Mister Laughlin; second by Mister Corbin. Outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
- T H F 61864 Highway 434 LLC (assessment no. 76875): affirmed total assessed value $80,024. Motion by Mister Burke; second by Mister Laughlin. Outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
- SSP Hospital Hospitality LLC (assessment no. 84944): affirmed total assessed value $209,229. Motion by Mister Corbin; second by Mister Laughlin. Outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
- Pelican Point (assessment no. 85611; transcript: "Pelican Point slide, Allison"): affirmed total assessed value $2,808,300. Motion by Mister Corbin; second by Mister Laughlin. Outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
- Professional Land Management Group (assessment no. 134536): assessed value stated in the transcript is not specified. Motion/second recorded; outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
- Michelle Robinson (assessment no. 43316): decreased total assessed value to $43,796. Motion recorded (transcript: "Motion by Miss Corbyn. Second by Bridal"); outcome: approved (unanimous with 3 absent).
Meeting process and recordkeeping
The clerk called the roll at the start of the meeting. Board members moved and seconded each item in sequence; multiple motions were recorded as moved by Corbin and seconded by Laughlin. In one instance the clerk asked a member for an individual verbal vote before recording the overall result. The transcript records the board as having a quorum and repeatedly records the formal outcome for each motion as unanimous with three members absent.
What the record does not specify
The transcript does not provide a full roll-call tally (yes/no/abstain) for each named member on every item; it records only that each motion was "unanimous with 3 absent." Several property names in the transcript are presented inconsistently (for example, "Slidell LLC" vs. "Slido LLC" and a partly garbled entry for a highway LLC). Where the transcript did not clearly identify a mover or seconder, the article lists those fields as not specified rather than assigning names.
The board adjourned after the final listed assessment.
