Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance Bonds Taxrate topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Goose Creek CISD CFO outlines certified values, proposes bond defeasance to save $7.4M; board authorizes bond redemption
Summary
CFO Bridget Clark reported rising certified property values, presented a proposal to defease $15.525 million of 2019A bonds to reduce interest costs by about $7.4 million, and presented a proposed voter‑approved tax rate of 1.07; trustees unanimously authorized the bond redemption resolution.
Goose Creek CISD Chief Financial Officer Bridget Clark told trustees the district’s certified property values increased and presented a bond defeasance plan and proposed tax‑rate decisions ahead of formal adoption.
Clark said strong economic conditions are driving certified values upward and provided detailed tax‑rate calculations: the district’s no‑new‑revenue tax rate (M&O) was reported as 0.7229 with I&S (interest & sinking) at 0.3169 for a combined 1.0398; administration proposed a voter‑approved tax rate (VATR) of 1.07 (M&O 0.745; I&S 0.3255). Clark noted adopting a VATR above the no‑new‑revenue rate requires a supermajority (five of seven trustees).
Bond defeasance and redemption: Clark recommended retiring $15,525,000 of outstanding 2019A series bonds in a defeasance transaction that administration projected would reduce future interest costs by about $7.4 million. Trustees considered and approved a resolution authorizing redemption of the bonds as presented; the action carried unanimously.
Budget context and taxpayer impact: Clark explained that the district’s budget adopted earlier assumed the voter‑approved rate; adopting the voter‑approved rate keeps enrichment pennies and maximizes state funding. She illustrated taxpayer impact on a $300,000 home (after homestead exemption assumptions) and showed that adopting a VATR of 1.07 would change the district tax due by a few dollars compared with other scenarios; she noted appraisal growth is largely outside the district’s control and that changes in local levy affect state funding entitlements.
Next steps and board reminders: Clark said the defeasance would be presented as an action item that night (item 7a) and that a bond refunding and final tax‑rate consideration were scheduled for the next meeting (October 6). She also summarized that the district has lowered its tax rate substantially since 2018 and placed the VATR proposal in peer context.
Trustee action: On agenda item 7a, Trustee Clemens moved and Trustee Guy seconded a resolution authorizing redemption of the bonds; the board approved the resolution unanimously.
Ending: Administration will bring the bond refunding for consideration at the next board meeting and continue tax‑rate steps required before final adoption.
