Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Termination topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Goose Creek CISD board declines proposal to terminate Lee High teacher after months of public outcry

5824441 · September 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After more than a dozen public commentators urged either discipline or protection for teachers over social-media comments about the death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, trustees voted on a proposed mid‑contract termination for Lee High School teacher Jennifer Coeur d'amanche; the motion failed.

A divided Goose Creek Consolidated Independent School District board considered, but did not approve, a motion to propose mid‑contract termination of Lee High School teacher Jennifer Coeur d'amanche after a wave of public comment both calling for discipline and urging restraint.

Speakers at the board’s meeting focused heavily on agenda item 7g, which drew more than a dozen members of the public. Some speakers said they wanted decisive action after what they described as educators celebrating the death of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. Others urged the board not to fire staff for out‑of‑class remarks and stressed the value of certain teachers to students and programs.

The board’s vote followed public comment. Trustee Clem moved to propose mid‑contract termination “for good cause” and Trustee Renteria seconded the motion. Trustees did not approve the motion; after a roll‑call procedure and discussion the board chair announced that the motion failed. The meeting minutes record that no termination took effect that night.

Why this matters: The item drew sustained public attention and illustrates a school district balancing personnel rules, community expectations and free‑speech claims. Several speakers tied their appeals to classroom climate, students’ sense of safety and the district’s professional standards.

What speakers said: Resident Nick Rice opened the public comment period saying the district must hold to standards of “integrity, empathy, and professionalism,” adding, “Teaching is built on trust.” Resident Brandon Terry said teachers “should be held to a higher standard,” and told trustees that “When the teacher enters the building, their personal agendas, their personal politics, their personal pronouns need to stay at home and out of the classroom.”

Other speakers framed the debate differently. Eddie Piceno warned of a chilling effect if teachers were fired for expressing political views outside the classroom. Joseph Allen said “encouraging violence is not okay” but urged careful application of job‑action rules. Mike Wolf, who identified himself as a former trustee and teacher, said, “Assassination is not something to be celebrated,” and urged the board to follow TEA rules.

Several speakers shifted focus to Lee High and Sterling High staff who supporters said provide critical extracurricular programming. Tracy Wells and others urged the district to return dance teacher Alice Hendrickson to her position at Lee High, describing her as “an asset” to students and the community and outlining long histories of student support and extracurricular leadership.

Board action and procedure: The motion that the board considered asked administration to notify the employee and proceed with a proposed mid‑contract termination. Trustee Clem moved the action and Trustee Renteria seconded. After discussion and a vote process, board leadership declared the motion failed and no termination was ordered at that time. The meeting record states that the board went into closed session earlier and reconvened; the final decision on the proposed termination did not result in an approved dismissal.

Context and next steps: Speakers referenced past incidents and long‑running community tensions; several said similar controversies occurred years earlier. The board did not outline further personnel steps publicly beyond the outcome of the vote; any follow‑up would be subject to personnel procedures and applicable state rules.

Ending: The district’s personnel item drew unusually large public turnout and polarized commentary. Trustees rejected the immediate mid‑contract termination motion at the meeting, leaving district leaders and the community to consider next procedural steps.