Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Public Private Partnerships topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake County planners promote public–private partnerships to expand affordable housing
Summary
County planning staff presented a framework for public–private partnerships (P3) to increase affordable and workforce housing, citing capital-stack challenges, site constraints, and examples from neighboring counties. The presentation proposed an implementation roadmap, community engagement, land-banking and preservation of existing affordable
County Community Planning & Development staff presented a public–private partnership (P3) approach to address Lake County’s housing shortage during the Sept. 23 work session, arguing the model can combine public land, incentives and private development capacity to produce deed-restricted and workforce housing.
The presenters, identified in the session as Jackie and a Planning Department colleague, outlined a set of challenges the county faces: limited construction season, high material and financing costs, land availability constraints and a complex capital stack for affordable housing. “Affordable housing is for people that live and work here and support us. It’s for teachers. It’s for firefighters. It’s for everybody,” Jackie said, summarizing the outreach message the department is trying to convey to residents who oppose development.
Staff described how P3 arrangements can lower development costs through land banking, density bonuses, fee waivers and gap financing; they cited nearby examples including Miller Ranch in Eagle County and Anvil Mountain in Silverton. They also emphasized that partnerships allow municipalities to embed equity goals and deed restrictions to preserve affordability over time.
Presenters discussed an implementation roadmap that begins with formalizing partnership agreements and proceeds through site planning, entitlement (subdivision and planned-unit developments) and construction. They said existing county- or city-owned land could play a role in lowering initial land costs and that some projects will emerge through requests from private developers while others may require a county-led RFP process.
On preservation and “naturally occurring affordable housing,” staff said the county must consider incentives to preserve and upgrade existing mobile-home parks and older housing stock; the presentation noted an internal estimate the county has a substantial share of empty single-family homes and that preservation is part of the emerging housing goals.
The planning staff said a separate environmental review (NEPA) and a traffic study have been commissioned for a larger “1 community” project and that the county has $850,000 in federal discretionary funding to access pending completion of a NEPA study. Commissioners asked about transparent, standard procedures to evaluate P3 proposals; staff said they will draft guidelines and a shared “holding place” for documents so commissioners and community members can review proposals and supporting materials.
No formal action was taken; staff will circulate the slide deck and follow-up materials and begin drafting partnership guidelines and potential RFP language for future consideration.
