Commission approves locally funded tree‑clearing to keep College Avenue project on schedule; vote 4-1
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Sign Up FreeSummary
The commission authorized a locally funded tree‑clearing contract for College Avenue Phase 1 to allow utility relocations to proceed ahead of construction, approving a one‑time expenditure estimated between $170,000 and $280,000; the motion passed 4-1.
The Goshen Redevelopment Commission on Sept. 9 approved a request to fund a local tree‑clearing project for College Avenue Phase 1, voting 4-1 to move forward with early clearing so utility relocations can begin without seasonal or scheduling delays.
Andrew Lund of Goshen Engineering described the timing pressure: utility relocations are expected to extend into early 2027, and NIPSCO Electric will need right‑of‑way clearing before setting new poles. Lund said both NIPSCO and other utilities need clearing completed before April 1 to avoid bat‑season restrictions and that contractor mobilization timing and holiday schedules risked delaying the work. “In order to get all that done and to help utility relocation start as soon as possible and minimize the risks of delay to the project, StructurePoint and engineering staff are recommending that a tree clearing project be performed, via locally funded project,” Lund said.
Staff estimated the locally funded clearing would be charged to the LPA project (100 percent local funding for the clearing) and provided an engineering cost range of $170,000 to $280,000 that includes a 15 percent contingency. Lund said the estimate is based on recent bid unit prices and that staff expects the actual cost may be toward the lower end of the range. The scope in the packet lists tree removals, stump removals and about 75 shrubs; commissioners and staff discussed that many of the trees are smaller screening plants though some larger hardwoods are included. Lund also said the estimate includes full stump removal to avoid future utility conflicts rather than stump grinding alone.
Commissioners asked about replacement plantings; staff said replanting was not included in the current scope and would be discussed later with redevelopment. The motion passed 4 to 1. The commission recorded the action but did not name the individual voters on the public record during the roll call.
Staff said the clearing would be performed under a separate local contract with a substantial completion requirement of January or very early February, to allow utility work and avoid seasonal restrictions.
