Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Facilities And Asset Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court postpones decision on future use of Meals on Wheels building; schedules walkthroughs
Summary
Johnson County discussed a request from Pecan Valley to use or acquire the former Meals on Wheels building; commissioners expressed concern about disposing of a county asset while the state occupies part of the building and asked staff to arrange site walkthroughs for commissioners.
Get email alerts on the County Facilities And Asset Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Johnson County Commissioners Court on Sept. 22 discussed requests from Pecan Valley to use or acquire the county’s former Meals on Wheels building. The building currently houses Pecan Valley (about one‑third of the space), the Texas Department of Health and Human Services (about one‑third), and a remaining vacant third that had been leased to Meals on Wheels.
Pecan Valley asked whether it could take ownership of the entire building (the organization initially inquired about donation of the property) or, alternatively, whether the county would consider a short‑ or medium‑term lease for the front portion of the building (the portion previously used by Meals on Wheels). County staff expressed concern about disposing of a building that also contains a state tenant and emphasized the public services both Pecan Valley and the state provide.
The court discussed potential alternative uses, including relocating the Medical Examiner’s office and freeing space for elections staff; staff estimated a partial remodel for that use could cost in the range of $750,000 to $1 million based on earlier, rough estimates. Commissioners said they did not want to accept a lease or donate the building if the county intended to pursue a remodel within a short time frame because it could unfairly require a tenant to vacate after investing in improvements.
No decision was made. The judge asked facilities staff to schedule a walkthrough of both facilities with two commissioners (excluding the judge) so the court could better evaluate parking, space needs and remodeling costs before returning to the issue. Facilities staff said the south parking lot is substantial and could accommodate Medical Examiner needs if the court later decided to relocate that office.
Ending: The court postponed action and asked staff to coordinate site visits; Pecan Valley will be informed that the court is still studying options.
