Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic‑preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oroville historical panel approves Jordan Crossing 480‑square‑foot shed with conditions
Summary
The Oroville Historical Advisory Committee approved a premanufactured 480‑square‑foot accessory structure at Jordan Crossing, 1567 Huntoon Street, with conditions limiting occupancy and utility connections and requiring building‑department sign‑off.
The Oroville Historical Advisory Committee on Aug. 28 voted to approve a premanufactured 480‑square‑foot accessory structure installed at 1567 Huntoon Street, the site of Jordan Crossing Ministries, subject to conditions from the building department.
City planner Wes Irvin told the committee the structure had already been installed but remained under building review, and that staff recommended approval provided the building department approve any occupancy and restrict utilities. Irvin said the applicant had installed a 100‑amp electrical service and represented the shed would be used primarily for storage rather than living or office space.
Neighbor Brian Wong testified in support, saying the Jordan Crossing project had reduced break‑ins and improved safety in that part of downtown. “They’ve completely renovated the buildings,” Wong said, adding he had observed tasteful, quality work on the property.
Applicant representative Bill Lagrone described planned refinements to the structure and said the group had applied for permits on June 19 after moving the premanufactured unit into place. Lagrone said the “vast majority of the time, this structure will be nothing more than a storage facility,” and that during special events the space might be used for small concessions; he added, “There’ll be no cooking in it. Nobody’s going to live in it. There’s going to be no water hooked up to it, no sewer.”
Committee members debated historic‑district standards. Several commissioners praised Jordan Crossing’s contributions to downtown vitality but said they were concerned about manufactured structures in the historic overlay and urged stricter code language over time. Commissioners also agreed they wanted to preserve mature trees on the site.
The committee approved the structure, with the motion passing 5 yes, 1 no and 1 absent. The approval includes the recommended conditions that the building department must first approve any occupancy and that no utilities other than electricity be attached without further sign‑off.
Committee members additionally asked staff to begin exploring an expansion of the historic preservation boundaries and to revisit language in the historic overlay that commissioners said ambiguously referenced a “turn‑of‑the‑twentieth‑century” theme.
Copies of the committee’s recommended conditions and the building‑department checklist remain part of the file; staff and the applicant will continue work on foundation, skirting and final occupancy approvals per the building department’s list of required corrections.
