Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shelter Cove parks committee, board weigh sports court grant and a possible scope change to repair community clubhouse
Summary
The board discussed whether a state grant awarded for a multiuse sports court should be redirected to repair the community clubhouse after residents raised concerns about the clubhouse's condition. Staff recommended awaiting bids; the board did not adopt a scope change at Tuesday's meeting.
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members and residents debated whether to change the scope of a California Department of Parks and Recreation capital grant, originally awarded for a multiuse sports court near the community clubhouse, to fund repairs to the clubhouse instead.
Background: The district applied for and received a grant of approximately $177,952 in 2022 for a multiuse sports court near the clubhouse; staff and the board later increased the district's in-kind match to about $110,000 and the project cost estimate to roughly $287,952 after redesign and permitting costs.
Staff report and options: Chris (general manager) told the board he had asked the grant administrator if the funds could be applied to rehabilitating the community clubhouse; the grant administrator said a scope change is possible but noted the project must be completed by Dec. 31, 2027, and that costs already incurred are reimbursable. Staff recommended waiting to see how construction bids come in before making any major scope decision.
Debate and community input: Members of the parks and recreation advisory committee, court users and other residents made opposing arguments. Supporters of the court, including organized pickleball players and tournament organizers, said the sports court would be used frequently, benefit youth and visitors, and bring economic activity. Opponents and some board members said the community clubhouse serves as the district's emergency shelter and that its deferred maintenance and mold problems justify redirecting available state funds to the building.
A complicating factor: The proposed sports court site sits in the county's airport land-use compatibility Zone 2. County aviation staff told the district that organized, scheduled team or league activities would be considered "group recreational activities" and are not allowed in Zone 2; ad hoc play (ad hoc 3-on-3 or 5-on-5) would not be considered group recreation. The county conditions of approval for the sports-court permit therefore prohibit formal leagues and tournaments at the chosen site.
Result and next steps: The board heard extensive public comment and several directors urged continuing with the sports-court procurement to see bid prices; others urged pursuing grants for clubhouse repairs and investigating relocating the court. No scope change was adopted at the meeting. Staff said bids had been solicited and would be reviewed when they are returned; staff will bring an action item back to the October board meeting if the board wants to change project scope.
Ending: The grant administrator's memo and two years of design and permitting work remain on the record; the board must reconcile the permit conditions, the grant terms and the community's competing priorities before deciding whether to redirect the awarded funds.

