Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Design Review topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Core Area Advisory Board backs 25% glazing-loss threshold in fast-track design review recommendation

5797346 · September 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Bend Core Area Advisory Board voted to recommend a 25% glazing-loss threshold for a proposed design-review exemption and will forward that recommendation to the Bend Planning Commission and Bend City Council.

The Core Area Advisory Board on an apparent voice vote moved to recommend a 25% threshold for glazing loss as the limit for a proposed design-review exemption and asked staff to send that recommendation to the Bend Planning Commission and Bend City Council.

Board members debated the threshold before the motion. One board member said a 25% threshold made sense; another suggested 15% could be acceptable if the planning commission preferred a stricter number. After discussion a motion was made and seconded to recommend the 25% threshold; no opposing votes were recorded on the motion in the meeting transcript.

The board clarified during discussion that the exemption is intended to be a fast-track option only and that projects losing more than the stated glazing threshold would continue to be subject to the city’s full design-review process. A participant asked for the board’s suggested language so staff could present it to the planning commission; the board agreed it would be useful for staff to include the board’s recommendation when the planning commission considers the amendment.

The action recorded at the meeting is a formal recommendation to the Bend Planning Commission and Bend City Council. The board did not adopt final code language at the meeting; the body directed staff to transmit the recommendation and indicated the planning commission could amend the suggested threshold when it considers the item.

The board moved on to the next agenda item after the vote; no further formal actions on this topic were recorded in the transcript.

Looking ahead, the recommendation will appear in staff materials forwarded to the planning commission and city council; those bodies will make any final changes to code language and determine whether to adopt the exemption.