Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retiree Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Retired Marion police and firefighters urge council to restore health coverage; city cites Iowa code change
Summary
Retired Marion police officers and firefighters told the City Council on Sept. 18 that a planned termination of health coverage for some duty‑disabled retirees will impose severe financial hardship; city staff said a July 1, 2024 statutory change (referred to in the meeting as 'Iowa code 4 11') required review and led to notification and proposed changes.
Several retired Marion police officers and firefighters used the council’s Sept. 18 public forum to urge the city to reverse its plan to terminate comprehensive health insurance that some retirees currently receive for duty‑related disabilities. City staff said the change stems from a July 1, 2024 change referenced in the transcript as "Iowa code 4 11," and that the city provided advance notice and intends to comply with the statute while offering retirees the option to remain on the city plan by paying the full premium.
What speakers said - Wade Markley (retired fire marshal) said retirees received a letter in mid‑April notifying them of the termination, that letters were not mailed certified and some retirees opened notification weeks after mailing, and requested the city reconsider or provide better education on claims procedures. He said paying full premium would be unaffordable for many and described unclear administration of prior claims reporting. - Lance Miller (retired police sergeant) said he retired on a work‑related disability and that while the city’s letter initially cited Iowa code changes, his own research and conversations with HR indicated the law did not require termination of existing retiree coverage. He asked the council to grandfather current retirees and wrote, "Terminating my health care coverage may be legal, but certainly not morally correct, certainly not the morally correct thing to do." Miller said terminating benefits would impose costs comparable to his mortgage payment. - Bill Peckman (retired police officer) urged the city to honor past verbal and written assurances made by HR managers and to grandfather existing retirees. He warned the decision will damage recruitment and retention of future officers and reduce morale. - Jeff Fenerzaveld (retired firefighter-paramedic) described multiple surgeries and long‑term health impacts stemming from on‑the‑job injuries and told council that the city’s abrupt change has significant personal and financial consequences.
City response and staff explanation A city staff member and HR referenced a law change effective July 1, 2024 (recorded in the transcript as "Iowa code 4 11") that prompted review of how the city provides medical coverage for duty‑related disabilities. Staff said the city must avoid paying certain deductibles that the statute limits for work‑related disability claims and that the contracts in place contained notification/termination provisions; staff said retirees were provided notice and that retirees can remain on the municipal plan by paying the full premium. Staff also said offers such as paying the full premium with higher deductibles were discussed, and that mediation requests were considered by staff and not accepted.
What the council did No formal policy change or vote to reinstate benefits occurred at the meeting. Retirees requested council action to grandfather current beneficiaries and to pursue alternatives; staff said the city is complying with the statutory change and owed retirees notice in accordance with contract terms. Council did not adopt a motion or ordinance during the public forum; staff indicated further administrative follow‑up would occur.
Clarifying details and numbers cited - One speaker cited a city‑provided premium figure of roughly $800 per month plus a $200 deductible resulting in an estimated monthly cost of about $966 if a retiree paid full premium; the speaker said that cost would be unaffordable for many retirees. - Speakers said notification letters were mailed (not certified) in mid‑April and some retirees opened letters weeks later; retirees asked that future changes be grandfathered and applied only to future retirees.
Next steps and context Retiree speakers asked council to reconsider the city’s interpretation of the statutory change and to grandfather current retirees so they keep coverage without sudden, large out‑of‑pocket premiums. City staff said they would continue administrative review and that retirees could remain on the plan if they pay full premiums; no council vote was taken at this meeting.
