Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members and advocates criticize limited SB 131 cleanup; committee holds related trailer bill
Summary
Senators and dozens of public commenters criticized the narrow scope of cleanup language tied to SB 131's advanced‑manufacturing exemption. Senator Blake Spear and several colleagues said the package before the budget committee falls short of commitments made when SB 131 passed; the committee deferred a vote on the related trailer bill.
The Senate hearing featured intense pushback over cleanup to SB 131, the measure that created a limited CEQA exemption intended to speed advanced manufacturing projects. Several senators and speaker groups said promised protections for habitat, tribal consultation and labor standards were not included in the follow‑up legislation now before the committee.
Senator Blake Spear said she would not support the narrow trailer bill — AB 158 in the committee print — and criticized its failure to include promised protections for habitat for protected species. “SB 158, as it's before us today, does not include environmental protections for habitat for protected species,” she said. “... I won't be voting in support of SB 158 today.”
Senator Menjivar and others echoed concerns that the cleanup language was insufficient for environmental justice communities and labor. Menjivar and Senator Smallwood Cuevas said a 300‑foot buffer in the Senate's separate proposal (AB 145) is inadequate and that other promised measures — including stronger labor and tribal consultation safeguards — were missing.
Department of Finance staff and Senate leaders said the full, broader cleanup proposal was printed by the Senate earlier in the day as AB 145 and that broader follow‑up legislation remains under negotiation with the Assembly and the governor, but that the Assembly prefers to move a narrower set of items now and continue discussions over the fall. Senate leaders said they would continue working toward a three‑party agreement and had put their larger cleanup proposal into public print to inform stakeholders.
After the discussion and public comments from dozens of environmental justice, labor and conservation groups urging stronger protections, the chair announced the committee would not vote on the trailer bill tied to SB 131 that night. The chair said the measure would be held in committee for further work.
Why it matters: The dispute centers on whether projects that might otherwise be exempted from CEQA review should be subject to strengthened protections for endangered species habitat, tribal consultation, community health and labor standards. Opponents warned that broad exemptions could allow hazardous industrial projects near homes and schools without public notice or environmental review.
Public comment and stakeholder concerns: Numerous environmental justice and conservation organizations — including the Planning and Conservation League, Leadership Council for Justice and Accountability, and the California Environmental Justice Alliance — told the committee the cleanup language failed to keep promises made when SB 131 moved earlier in the session. Speakers cited risks from hazardous materials, air pollution and threats to culturally important tribal resources. Labor and community representatives urged high‑road job requirements and community benefits agreements for advanced manufacturing projects.
Ending
Senate leadership said it would continue to negotiate with the Assembly and the governor over the fall. The committee shelved the trailer bill for further work; sponsors said they had printed a broader Senate proposal (AB 145) but lacked a three‑party agreement to move it this session.
