Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves 2025–26 pupil progression plan revisions, including third-grade standards and course-choice language
Summary
The committee approved updates to the district’s 2025–26 pupil progression plan that clarify K–3 screening language, split third-grade science and social studies standards, and add state-required sections on course choice and a scholarship provision referenced in meeting materials.
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Terrebonne Parish Education Technology and Policy Committee approved revisions to the 2025–26 pupil progression plan, which sets local rules for student promotion, grading, honor-roll and valedictorian selection.
Dr. Monica Breaux, who reviewed the plan for the committee, said the district annually reviews the pupil progression plan. Among the changes, Breaux said the K–3 language was simplified: for first and second grades the plan now requires a composite score "above the lowest achievement level" on the end-of-year literacy screener rather than the previously confusing phrasing listing multiple achievement categories. For third grade, the committee adopted promotional standards that treat science and social studies as separate subjects; third-graders must pass at least three of four major subjects (language arts, math, science or social studies) with a minimum grade of D and meet the literacy-screener requirement.
Breaux said the state added two sections to the pupil progression plan template: a section outlining district duties on course choice and a section referencing a scholarship for students to attend private schools; the transcript referenced the scholarship as "Louisiana Gator." The committee packet contained the draft plan and the language the district is adopting.
A motion to approve the 2025–26 pupil progression plan revisions was moved, seconded and approved; the transcript does not record a roll-call vote tally.
The committee did not change the district’s broader promotion or honor-roll processes at this meeting beyond the clarifications described; Dr. Breaux noted the changes were aimed at clarifying language and aligning the district document with recent state additions to the required plan sections.

